Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sat 3rd April Man Utd Chelsea

>

> Could all be over by then?


Although Arsenal are not the strongest team (hence home & away defeats to both Utd and Chelsea) they have a significantly easier run in to the title than either Utd or Chelsea which will be made a lot smoother if they lose to Porto in CL tomorrow night.

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sat 3rd April Man Utd Chelsea

>

> Could all be over by then?


Yep...



Premier League Table - March 7 2010

Pos...Team..............P........Pts

1.....Man. United.....29......63

2.....Chelsea...........28......61

3.....Arsenal............29......61

4.....T. Hotspur........28......49

5.....Man. City..........27......49


C'mon you Red Devils...



Matthew123 Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

>"Although Arsenal are not the strongest team..."


how diplomatic!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >"Although Arsenal are not the strongest team..."

>

>

> how diplomatic!


Matthew 123 has said this on many occasions, he has often made reference to the fact that, and these are his words "Arsenal are physically weak", but I noticed when we beat Liverpool both home and away, he didn't mention it then. Perhaps because this would have made his own beloved Liverpool, by his own definition, weaker than Arsenal.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Matthew 123 has said..."Arsenal are phsically weak",

> but I noticed when we beat Liverpool both home and

> away, he didn't mention it then. Perhaps because

> this would have made his own beloved Liverpool, by

> his own definition, weaker than Arsenal.



*massive burst of laughter*


Fabulously astute analysis Atila!;-)


Oh...while I'm here...hey everyone, I really didn't mean to offend anyone earlier (including you Jah)...am just having a laugh...there's not much else going on on the forum at the moment...hopefully (for you) I'll be out of your hair soon xxx

I think relatively speaking Arsenal are physically weaker than Liverpool, United and Chelsea (hell look at their continual injury list!) ... and you could also say they are weaker than Bolton, Blackburn etc. But my remark was about Arsenal not being the strongest/best team in the division.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think relatively speaking Arsenal are physically

> weaker than Liverpool, United and Chelsea (hell

> look at their continual injury list!) ... and you

> could also say they are weaker than Bolton,

> Blackburn etc. But my remark was about Arsenal not

> being the strongest/best team in the division.


Then using your criteria, we are stronger than Liverpool, Bolton and Blackburn. We haven't lost to any of those teams. Secondly, the only team I thought we were physically overrun was the home loss to Man U.We certainly didn't look weak when they, ONLY JUST beat us at their place, with the help of a dubious penalty decison, but thats one of those things, we didn't look phyically weak at Stamford Bridge and didn't play that badly. This physically weak thing is nonsense. Getting injured doesn't mean that our players are weak, unlucky, certainly, victims of some overly zealous challenges, oh yes. But physically weak? Diaby, Song, Vermaelen, Eboue, these do not come across as weak players, and Campbell certainly isn't weak . The easiest man to push off a ball, regularly fall over, I've ever seen play in the Prem is Emile Heskey, and how big is he!!!!


Arsenal physically weak, as the French would say NON!

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> and is back in the room.


Well it was a bit unbecoming for a gentleman to be kicked out of his own thread. Provocation I'd say.


PS How did he show you?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Administrator Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> > and is back in the room.

>

>

> Oh crikey!


You can run, but you can't hide........

>

> *screams for help and legs it at full speed*

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> and is back in the room.


Double standards have been applied here. Whatever the provocation, he was banned and rightly so. Does this mean we can all start name calling, beg forgiveness and be let back in?

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chris Waddle has launched a withering attack on

> Theo Walcott after his performance for England

> against Egypt last night, accusing the Arsenal

> winger of lacking a "football brain". The former

> England international is not convinced Walcott has

> developed his game since he broke into the

> Southampton team as a teenager. "


Was he also at the game on Saturday when the kid had a blinder and scored an excellent goal?

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Walcott scored a goal on sunday and in your

> words had a 'good game'. One swallow doesn't make

> a summer. He's crap.


Just like you're team son. Chosen ones? For what, the butt of everyones jokes? As for crap, your team is littered with it as are your fans and your club.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We are given to understand that she delegated the task of letting it out to an estate agent.  This suggests it's the agent who is responsible.
    • Do they require a direct debit?
    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...