Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Matthew has hit the nail on the head. They

> don't want to loan players to clubs who they think

> are rivals... in this case Arsenal. Now they've

> got a few bob they're really up themselves. I

> really hope Man City have crap season. Arrogant

> feckers.


Sounds like common sense to me rather than arrogance..

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Apparently Shay Given has chosen Celtic

>

> You mean City gave Shay Given a choice of Clubs

> and from that he has chosen Celtic


I know its a wind up Matthew. But no, you is plain wrong innit - can I direct you to the person on the right with the shades, at Celtic Park, supporting his team. Now he might get the chance to play for them.


 

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Matthew has hit the nail on the head. They

> don't want to loan players to clubs who they think

> are rivals... in this case Arsenal. Now they've

> got a few bob they're really up themselves. I

> really hope Man City have crap season. Arrogant

> feckers.



B O L L O C K S

He wants to play for Celtic, not Arsenal.

It would be great to get Shay - but many a slip between cup and lip where any transfer to Celtic is concerned.


Good win for the boys last night.....2-0 at home to Utrecht, any dutch team is always dangerous, and a rare clean sheet. 95/1 to win the Europa League......

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it was the beginning of the end for Gallas

> when he was incapable of dealing with 2 ashley

> cole crosses at the Emirates last season, both of

> which led to chelsea goals.

>

> I don't know why Spurs want him.


Indeed... or his appalling behaviour at Birmingham a couple of seasons ago which led to him eventually losing the captaincy. He has been a good player in the past but I think he is well past his sell by date. I can't see how this will work whether on the pitch, in the dressing room or in the stands from the people (the fans) who ultimately pay his wages.

Great game that, how football should be played.


Scholes goal was magnificent, but that Ref must have Man U tattoo'd on his a$re. The same coont that sent off Joe Cole last week. Blatant pen denied when Fulham player hauled to the ground then the Ref trumped that by giving a pen to United. I can find no excuse for that Pen whatsover.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
    • I think the accusation derives from the Greens mobilising the Muslim vote, hence engaging in sectarian politics. But happy to be corrected    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...