Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm here, just basking in goal difference! Two

> whisky macs says we'll win.


I already owe you 2. So it will be 4 if we lose again. But we wont. Im looking forward to a celtic park goal fest. 4 for us and 1 for you.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can have him BR. I think we've had the best of

> him. Plus the idiots at MC will pay way over the

> odds. ;)



We neither need nor want him tbh. Yes you have had the best of him. I've a feeling he'll play more reserve games than first team. get dropped by England and his value will plummet.

Mancini seems adamant that he will not make a bid come January but maybe look at him next summer, after Rooney buys out his contract and moves on a free. We've still Kolarov and Balotelli to make an appearance.

Bale Bale Bale. Three-nil with ten men to us second half. Nightmare start but showed very good character to come back and with the players we've got missing it could have been very embarrassing but we did more than enough to save our blushes second half with a much better performance and the boy Bale is the canine's testicles. When he plays like that there is no stopping him.

Bit of luck that the other result went our way too. A little more confident for the return match at White Hart Lane in a fortnight's time.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely gutted. We should have been out of

> sight against Valencia.

> Played very well, missed a barrow load of "easy"

> chances.

> A point before the game, yes please.

> A point after the game, deflated.



Deflated - Blow it up again before Sunday, you'll be fine.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SCSB79 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Absolutely gutted. We should have been out of

> > sight against Valencia.

> > Played very well, missed a barrow load of

> "easy"

> > chances.

> > A point before the game, yes please.

> > A point after the game, deflated.

>

>

> Deflated - Blow it up again before Sunday, you'll

> be fine.


Quietly confident for Sunday MM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From what I have gathered from Bradbury Oak residents  I have spoken with, that at a meeting with RNIB earlier in the year, none of the residents were in favour of new build. There is the implication that rent rises are anticipated to help towards building costs. Rent is currently in the region of £300 pw - as with most sheltered housing (council and Housing Association), Since these rents also include maintenance charges, utility charges - Housing Benefit is only applicable to the actual 'rent element' per flat.
    • At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households. Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.
    • Personally, I think the death sentance should be brought back for anyone found to be harming animals. 
    • When you dig into the site, there's an ancillary domain also involved in the system: neighbourhoodalert.co.uk;  and one pointed to by the latter as an example, stayintheknow.co.uk, which seems to have been set up by Lancashire.  All three long validated by Nominet and with same registrar.    metengage_etc_whois.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...