Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm here, just basking in goal difference! Two

> whisky macs says we'll win.


I already owe you 2. So it will be 4 if we lose again. But we wont. Im looking forward to a celtic park goal fest. 4 for us and 1 for you.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can have him BR. I think we've had the best of

> him. Plus the idiots at MC will pay way over the

> odds. ;)



We neither need nor want him tbh. Yes you have had the best of him. I've a feeling he'll play more reserve games than first team. get dropped by England and his value will plummet.

Mancini seems adamant that he will not make a bid come January but maybe look at him next summer, after Rooney buys out his contract and moves on a free. We've still Kolarov and Balotelli to make an appearance.

Bale Bale Bale. Three-nil with ten men to us second half. Nightmare start but showed very good character to come back and with the players we've got missing it could have been very embarrassing but we did more than enough to save our blushes second half with a much better performance and the boy Bale is the canine's testicles. When he plays like that there is no stopping him.

Bit of luck that the other result went our way too. A little more confident for the return match at White Hart Lane in a fortnight's time.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely gutted. We should have been out of

> sight against Valencia.

> Played very well, missed a barrow load of "easy"

> chances.

> A point before the game, yes please.

> A point after the game, deflated.



Deflated - Blow it up again before Sunday, you'll be fine.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SCSB79 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Absolutely gutted. We should have been out of

> > sight against Valencia.

> > Played very well, missed a barrow load of

> "easy"

> > chances.

> > A point before the game, yes please.

> > A point after the game, deflated.

>

>

> Deflated - Blow it up again before Sunday, you'll

> be fine.


Quietly confident for Sunday MM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...