Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've told you before and I won't tell you

> again.

> > No no no no no no no no no no Annasfield. NO NO

> NO

> > NO NO. Just because you don't want Man Utd to

> > equal your title winning record and Liverpool

> have

> > no chance this season it's no excuse to want

> the

> > Gooners to win it.

>

> Ahem, a win this season would surpass their

> record...

>

> Personally I like the Spurs and after the years in

> the wilderness it's nice to see them doing well.

> COYS (after United of course). Obviously I'd like

> to see United winning the CL as well but it would

> be an amazing story if Spurs won it. I'd be happy

> for them.


And it goes without saying I wouldn't be happy for either of these two to win anything at all.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like Arsenal. Not mentioning the Mancs. Chelsea

> and Torres can fvck right off and City? - pft.

> Spurs fans have been bad enough simply qualifying

> for the Champions League. You'd be unbearable if

> you won the league.

>

> Come on you Gooners!!!!


Many thanks for your support Anna - and you are right about Torres!

Dont get me wrong Jah, I'd love Spurs to win the CL. The only thing thats wound me up this season is the way the fans have often talked like they're old hands at being a top team, rather than on an exciting journey on the way up. Dont know what it is about Arsenal, but I just never get excited about them these days, I preferred the team of the late 90s as they were exciting. Yes Arsenal play great football, but it's somehow too clinical for my tastes. Still, I'd rather them than United or Chelsea, especially given the latter's recent signing.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with you. Personally I'm not outraged,

> just gutted over the way he's gone about it, and

> his attitude on the pitch (sulky little girl).


His attitude was appalling. Funny how he always seemed to score against Chelsea isn't it. If I was Roy Hodgson I'd be really pissed off because he obviously didn't want to play for him.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ronaldo came from Benfica.

>

> Yes I know, with Ronaldo I was just talking more

> generally about players leaving Utd


Well you two experts are both wrong. He didn't come from Benfica.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Utd have six, apart from Giggs, Scholes and

> Neville, they also have Fletcher, O'Shea, and

> Brown. They have the advantage of success though

> so players only tend to move when Fergie decides -

> only excpetion I can think of is

> Ronaldo.


Obertan has decided it's easier in France.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...