Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've told you before and I won't tell you

> again.

> > No no no no no no no no no no Annasfield. NO NO

> NO

> > NO NO. Just because you don't want Man Utd to

> > equal your title winning record and Liverpool

> have

> > no chance this season it's no excuse to want

> the

> > Gooners to win it.

>

> Ahem, a win this season would surpass their

> record...

>

> Personally I like the Spurs and after the years in

> the wilderness it's nice to see them doing well.

> COYS (after United of course). Obviously I'd like

> to see United winning the CL as well but it would

> be an amazing story if Spurs won it. I'd be happy

> for them.


And it goes without saying I wouldn't be happy for either of these two to win anything at all.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like Arsenal. Not mentioning the Mancs. Chelsea

> and Torres can fvck right off and City? - pft.

> Spurs fans have been bad enough simply qualifying

> for the Champions League. You'd be unbearable if

> you won the league.

>

> Come on you Gooners!!!!


Many thanks for your support Anna - and you are right about Torres!

Dont get me wrong Jah, I'd love Spurs to win the CL. The only thing thats wound me up this season is the way the fans have often talked like they're old hands at being a top team, rather than on an exciting journey on the way up. Dont know what it is about Arsenal, but I just never get excited about them these days, I preferred the team of the late 90s as they were exciting. Yes Arsenal play great football, but it's somehow too clinical for my tastes. Still, I'd rather them than United or Chelsea, especially given the latter's recent signing.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with you. Personally I'm not outraged,

> just gutted over the way he's gone about it, and

> his attitude on the pitch (sulky little girl).


His attitude was appalling. Funny how he always seemed to score against Chelsea isn't it. If I was Roy Hodgson I'd be really pissed off because he obviously didn't want to play for him.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ronaldo came from Benfica.

>

> Yes I know, with Ronaldo I was just talking more

> generally about players leaving Utd


Well you two experts are both wrong. He didn't come from Benfica.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Utd have six, apart from Giggs, Scholes and

> Neville, they also have Fletcher, O'Shea, and

> Brown. They have the advantage of success though

> so players only tend to move when Fergie decides -

> only excpetion I can think of is

> Ronaldo.


Obertan has decided it's easier in France.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...