Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am no fan of the Mancs by any stretch (although I'm warmer to them as a result of the bias rubbish that gets posted on on here about them, ferguson, Rooney etc) but there is no way that they'd let 4-0 go and that's why I suspect they will be deserved champions this year.

I mean... penalty?


If anyone thinks there would be two penalties given against utd like that they're dreaming


And yet and yet... it is still Arsenal's fault. I do know that. I'm more angry with them than I am anyone else (apart from the ref). and Newcastle had a good goal disallowed


But no way would Utd or Chelsea have those two decisions given against them. And that played a HUGE part in the result


And watching our keeper get a card whilst 2 newcastle players basically assaulted him? It's bullshit. I genuinely am all Fabregas about the ref's performance. who payed who?

soft pens are given all the time. And I'll take the first one. But the second on it's own is bad enough, but combined with the general way decisions went in the second half has my spidey senses going


All told it's still Arsenal's fault. I'm just repeating that Man Utd or Chelsea would not have the same tally of decisions given against them. I think. For now. Maybe I'm wrong

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...