Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am no fan of the Mancs by any stretch (although I'm warmer to them as a result of the bias rubbish that gets posted on on here about them, ferguson, Rooney etc) but there is no way that they'd let 4-0 go and that's why I suspect they will be deserved champions this year.

I mean... penalty?


If anyone thinks there would be two penalties given against utd like that they're dreaming


And yet and yet... it is still Arsenal's fault. I do know that. I'm more angry with them than I am anyone else (apart from the ref). and Newcastle had a good goal disallowed


But no way would Utd or Chelsea have those two decisions given against them. And that played a HUGE part in the result


And watching our keeper get a card whilst 2 newcastle players basically assaulted him? It's bullshit. I genuinely am all Fabregas about the ref's performance. who payed who?

soft pens are given all the time. And I'll take the first one. But the second on it's own is bad enough, but combined with the general way decisions went in the second half has my spidey senses going


All told it's still Arsenal's fault. I'm just repeating that Man Utd or Chelsea would not have the same tally of decisions given against them. I think. For now. Maybe I'm wrong

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...