Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think what I object to is the fact that EC/Atila can't let a United game go by without attacking one or other of the team or the manager for cheating/diving/offending his sensibilities in some way or other. There is rarely a balanced analysis of the game from him or the possibility of a debate. There's no balance. There's no acceptance that maybe this is a game and other teams, including his own, might bend or break the rules or might have decisions go for them that shouldn't have. The same old insinuations get trotted out time after time, we had too much time added on, no one gets a penalty awarded against United, the referee is biased towards united, the commentators and media are biased towards United. It's tired and tiring (hence the yawn). Have a debate, make sensible comments about the team and the performance but why always bring it back to the fact that we are favoured or that so and so should have had a red card etc. etc.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think what I object to is the fact that EC/Atila

> can't let a United game go by without attacking

> one or other of the team or the manager for

> cheating/diving/offending his sensibilities in

> some way or other. There is rarely a balanced

> analysis of the game from him or the possibility

> of a debate. There's no balance. There's no

> acceptance that maybe this is a game and other

> teams, including his own, might bend or break the

> rules or might have decisions go for them that

> shouldn't have. The same old insinuations get

> trotted out time after time, we had too much time

> added on, no one gets a penalty awarded against

> United, the referee is biased towards united, the

> commentators and media are biased towards United.

> It's tired and tiring (hence the yawn). Have a

> debate, make sensible comments about the team and

> the performance but why always bring it back to

> the fact that we are favoured or that so and so

> should have had a red card etc. etc.



Most of this is erroneous, as for balance, most of the postings on here lack that.

After my betting streak earlier I don't think I'll risk it MM.


"Neil Lennon has insisted that capturing silverware with Celtic is his top priority, rather than winning a personal Old Firm duel with Walter Smith."


What's wrong with the man? It's all about OF Derby!

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cheers Chavski. Fergusons comments bemoaning the

> refs decisions going against them were steeped in

> irony. Luiz not being sent off was his chief

> gripe. Has he never heard of karma? What goes

> around comes around eh Fergie? Rooney should have

> been serving a ban so strictly speaking shouldn't

> have been on the the pitch for Luiz to foul, but

> hey, I'm not arguing. And Vidic out for Liverpool

> game. Oh dear!!


The time for Fergie to have said all that about a player who should have got sent off, bad Ref, and how it changed the game, was at Wigan. Then perhaps instead of neutrals like myself pissing themselves laughing with his hypocracy last night, in his post match interview, he'd have banked some credibility rather than what is now just the sad pathetic snide remarks of a foul old Manager trying to influence the Ref ahead of Sunday's game at Anfield.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Watched the Old Firm match tonight on Sky - utter

> disgrace. Do we want them in Premiership - no

> thanks!!


At the risk of being accused of being antagonistic, inflammatory etc I agree. No place in the game for such nonsense, maybe in Latin America, but not here.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cheers Chavski. Fergusons comments bemoaning

> the

> > refs decisions going against them were steeped

> in

> > irony. Luiz not being sent off was his chief

> > gripe. Has he never heard of karma? What goes

> > around comes around eh Fergie? Rooney should

> have

> > been serving a ban so strictly speaking

> shouldn't

> > have been on the the pitch for Luiz to foul,

> but

> > hey, I'm not arguing. And Vidic out for

> Liverpool

> > game. Oh dear!!

>

> The time for Fergie to have said all that about a

> player who should have got sent off, bad Ref, and

> how it changed the game, was at Wigan. Then

> perhaps instead of neutrals like myself pissing

> themselves laughing with his hypocracy last night,

> in his post match interview, he'd have banked some

> credibility rather than what is now just the sad

> pathetic snide remarks of a foul old Manager

> trying to influence the Ref ahead of Sunday's game

> at Anfield.


I'm surprised you haven't had Narnia and Sandperson accusing you of imbalance, rudeness, being inflammatory etc. You can bet if I'd put that on here, they'd have been at me straight away.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It just might be because Matthew is a Liverpool

> supporter but I did agree with your original post

> yesterday (perhaps you've forgotten that) and I

> also thoroughly agree with Matthew's post today

> too.


No I haven't forgotten, but where on this post have I said Jah Lush will be after you? Can we now agree to move on?

> Emerson Crane wrote -


> No I haven't forgotten, but where on this post

> have I said Jah Lush will be after you? Can we now

> agree to move on?


I'm not after you. Do you have a persecution complex? Yes, let's move on shall we.


Looks like the FA are after Ferguson for his latest slur on poor refereeing. Matthew's point about his timing after Rooney's elbow last week is spot on.

If anyone cares to bother, please scroll back and find that I was the first person on this thread to accuse Rooney of thuggery in the Wigan match. It got completely overlooked until some of you read about it in the papers I suppose. It can't be true if it's not in a paper, can it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm glad you are making good use of your car, but bemused how you are saving on petrol by only half filling every 3-4 weeks? Unless this prevents you using the car as often as you would like, surely you would use just the same amount of petrol, and spend the same amount of money, if you filled it up completely every 6 - 8 weeks? Have I missed something here? 
    • @Administrator seems they are still claiming to be linked to this forum.    https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1AkCyCGAxg/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • Would Leon install a new double oven? Our eye level double oven was installed when we had our kitchen installed around 20 years ago and will need to be replaced with similar. I think we had 2 people to install it then - so does Leon work alone?
    • My car was registered in 2004. Automatic, ULEZ compatible.  Used to use it daily for work until 2016 when retired. Still used 3-5 days weekly after that as was doing voluntary work. My mobility has gradually declined and  it is painful to walk.. Family live in Kent, Essex and Sussex - so need car to visit them. My car battery is 2 years old - when had to call out RAC to assist at home as it was dead, they found it was the original battery installed in 2004!! My car is essential - shopping each week, being able to go to garden centres, or DIY stores, taking the cat to the vet and  other social activities. I now only half fill with petrol every 3- 4 weeks, so save that way. I am careful  with my finances and would be lost without the car. It is regularly maintained (Turners).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...