Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think what I object to is the fact that EC/Atila can't let a United game go by without attacking one or other of the team or the manager for cheating/diving/offending his sensibilities in some way or other. There is rarely a balanced analysis of the game from him or the possibility of a debate. There's no balance. There's no acceptance that maybe this is a game and other teams, including his own, might bend or break the rules or might have decisions go for them that shouldn't have. The same old insinuations get trotted out time after time, we had too much time added on, no one gets a penalty awarded against United, the referee is biased towards united, the commentators and media are biased towards United. It's tired and tiring (hence the yawn). Have a debate, make sensible comments about the team and the performance but why always bring it back to the fact that we are favoured or that so and so should have had a red card etc. etc.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think what I object to is the fact that EC/Atila

> can't let a United game go by without attacking

> one or other of the team or the manager for

> cheating/diving/offending his sensibilities in

> some way or other. There is rarely a balanced

> analysis of the game from him or the possibility

> of a debate. There's no balance. There's no

> acceptance that maybe this is a game and other

> teams, including his own, might bend or break the

> rules or might have decisions go for them that

> shouldn't have. The same old insinuations get

> trotted out time after time, we had too much time

> added on, no one gets a penalty awarded against

> United, the referee is biased towards united, the

> commentators and media are biased towards United.

> It's tired and tiring (hence the yawn). Have a

> debate, make sensible comments about the team and

> the performance but why always bring it back to

> the fact that we are favoured or that so and so

> should have had a red card etc. etc.



Most of this is erroneous, as for balance, most of the postings on here lack that.

After my betting streak earlier I don't think I'll risk it MM.


"Neil Lennon has insisted that capturing silverware with Celtic is his top priority, rather than winning a personal Old Firm duel with Walter Smith."


What's wrong with the man? It's all about OF Derby!

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cheers Chavski. Fergusons comments bemoaning the

> refs decisions going against them were steeped in

> irony. Luiz not being sent off was his chief

> gripe. Has he never heard of karma? What goes

> around comes around eh Fergie? Rooney should have

> been serving a ban so strictly speaking shouldn't

> have been on the the pitch for Luiz to foul, but

> hey, I'm not arguing. And Vidic out for Liverpool

> game. Oh dear!!


The time for Fergie to have said all that about a player who should have got sent off, bad Ref, and how it changed the game, was at Wigan. Then perhaps instead of neutrals like myself pissing themselves laughing with his hypocracy last night, in his post match interview, he'd have banked some credibility rather than what is now just the sad pathetic snide remarks of a foul old Manager trying to influence the Ref ahead of Sunday's game at Anfield.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Watched the Old Firm match tonight on Sky - utter

> disgrace. Do we want them in Premiership - no

> thanks!!


At the risk of being accused of being antagonistic, inflammatory etc I agree. No place in the game for such nonsense, maybe in Latin America, but not here.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cheers Chavski. Fergusons comments bemoaning

> the

> > refs decisions going against them were steeped

> in

> > irony. Luiz not being sent off was his chief

> > gripe. Has he never heard of karma? What goes

> > around comes around eh Fergie? Rooney should

> have

> > been serving a ban so strictly speaking

> shouldn't

> > have been on the the pitch for Luiz to foul,

> but

> > hey, I'm not arguing. And Vidic out for

> Liverpool

> > game. Oh dear!!

>

> The time for Fergie to have said all that about a

> player who should have got sent off, bad Ref, and

> how it changed the game, was at Wigan. Then

> perhaps instead of neutrals like myself pissing

> themselves laughing with his hypocracy last night,

> in his post match interview, he'd have banked some

> credibility rather than what is now just the sad

> pathetic snide remarks of a foul old Manager

> trying to influence the Ref ahead of Sunday's game

> at Anfield.


I'm surprised you haven't had Narnia and Sandperson accusing you of imbalance, rudeness, being inflammatory etc. You can bet if I'd put that on here, they'd have been at me straight away.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It just might be because Matthew is a Liverpool

> supporter but I did agree with your original post

> yesterday (perhaps you've forgotten that) and I

> also thoroughly agree with Matthew's post today

> too.


No I haven't forgotten, but where on this post have I said Jah Lush will be after you? Can we now agree to move on?

> Emerson Crane wrote -


> No I haven't forgotten, but where on this post

> have I said Jah Lush will be after you? Can we now

> agree to move on?


I'm not after you. Do you have a persecution complex? Yes, let's move on shall we.


Looks like the FA are after Ferguson for his latest slur on poor refereeing. Matthew's point about his timing after Rooney's elbow last week is spot on.

If anyone cares to bother, please scroll back and find that I was the first person on this thread to accuse Rooney of thuggery in the Wigan match. It got completely overlooked until some of you read about it in the papers I suppose. It can't be true if it's not in a paper, can it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Found at Upland Road bus stop 
    • Can we change the title of this thread please.  Every time I see it I think the pool has been closed again. 😆😆
    • Still a large patch of grit clearly visible in the middle of the pool yesterday (Tuesday).  On the plus side - the water was a lot warmer!
    • Thanks for the response and to some who PM’d me. I’m now included on the Patient Participation Group (meeting next in Dec) so I’m going to feed back the comments here, good and bad. Update today to PPG members is that, as some of you have said, there is a new contact in place with GP practices with effect from 1 Oct. That appears to be the driver for some of the changes we’ve seen at The Gardens. From the responses here, though, patients might be getting an inconsistent message from the Surgery; I was definitely told that appointments must be made through the app, and only the app. It was only when I expressed concern that a strictly online service would not be suitable for all, that I was told by the receptionist that she could complete the request for me (or others if needed). Even then, then patients would need to await a text from the Practice. Perhaps we are just teething problems with the new provision…Happy to bring any and all comments to the PPG meeting (although I’m aware that the most digitally-excluded people probably aren’t on EDF!) Thanks folks.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...