Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think crowds will be hostile, they'll take the piss mercilessly but there will be no hostility towards him.


The super-injunction was a massive own goal for him. If he'd held off I reckon the press would have sat on the story the same way they did a number of stories about Gary Linekar. He'd just about worked his way into national treasure status then went and slapped a gagging order on the press, something they don't take kindly to.

Whoops.


In fairness to him it was probably on advice from a lawyer seeing pound signs a-flashing.

Don't be ridiculous. He is world class. He may have only scored four times last season but he did pick up a niggly injury halfway through the season and missed a a few games but other than that he was brilliant and at times the best player on the pitch in most of the matches I saw him play. I'll be absolutely gutted if he leaves Spurs.

I'm a Spurs fan too, and love him. But he's not world class....yet. A move to Man Utd may be what he needs to achieve that level to be honest. That title is bandied about willy nilly to too many good players. He needs to produce regularly on the international and Champions league stage to qualify for it.

Very few players are truly world class.

As a Spurs fan I'm bloody glad that didn't happen. Any stadia that has a running track around it will not be a great theatre or create a great atmosphere for football and unless West Ham gain immediate promotion back to the Premiership they'll be playing in a white elephant of an empty stadium.

banned bloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally, as a Spurs fan, I think it's great

> news.


Sadly I have to agree. Pictures of the stadium make it look as though watching a game there will be like watching Orient... from Upton Park.


Temporary seating etc. could make a difference but is it REALLY (Matty Etherington's return apart) going to look like this?


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/121/255863389_47d2233f17.jpg






ETA: now Your Arsenal is closed can we expect an influx of chatty and disenfranchised Gooners on the EDF?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was it flying over, or actually in the park? I usually see them perched on things in the middle of the Thames! I rarely hear blackbirds these days. There used to be one who sang every evening from the top of a tall tree in a garden a few houses down from mine. It was really lovely to hear it. Then the tree was cut down 😭 
    • Post deleted due to a misunderstanding. DUH. Indeed. No evidence has been produced on either side. I sometimes drive up Sydenham Hill when there is no traffic in either direction. I don't take that to mean that no vehicles ever use it, apart from me,  and so there shouldn't be a road there at all! I often don't see pedestrians, either. So according to some people's logic, there shouldn't be a pavement. In any case, I'm not sure the actual numbers matter. Forgive me if I'm wrong, as I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wasn't the cycle lane supposed to be for safety reasons?
    • But a number of posters have said that in their experience they hardly ever see a cyclist on that route. There does not seem to be any data on cycle usage. Stand to be corrected if you have it?
    • It means people are pursuing culture wars by making stuff up based on their passionately held prejudices and acting as if it's a fact. See the OP and this as examples: https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/365902-bloody-sydenham-hill/#findComment-1717782
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...