Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?



The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or the one near the station, Clothes for Causes, which I always thought was more of a lifestyle support system for someone who wanted to build a profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?


There was one called Give and Take next to EDT which became Question Air and has now changed its name to something else

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> > clothes and closed - with a questionable

> business

> > model?

>


>

> The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or

> the one near the station, Clothes for Causes,

> which I always thought was more of a lifestyle

> support system for someone who wanted to build a

> profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.



The one with the questionable business model was Give and Take, now closed.


Though maybe Clothes for Causes did as well.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a lot of time of most of our local charity

> shops, but one in particular, is extremely rude

> and not very charitable at all. Hopefully the new

> one will be nice like most of the others.

>

> Louisa.




Would that be the smallest one, by any chance?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The floor space isn?t huge inside, but some of the

> egos that help out are. One particular member of

> staff is incredibly rude and doesn?t even try to

> hide it.

>



Is this the shop which has been discussed on here before due to weird random exclusions of particular items from offers publicised in the shop?

Yes Sue it is. And I know people have suggested previously that some of the helpers may have certain health related issues, but there is no excuse for rummaging through a donated bag of goods in front of customers and the person kind enough to donate them, and suggesting said donated items are not wanted or they have too much already. It?s iust plain rude. If someone is kind enough to donate, these people should at least show some gratitude. The lovely people at St Christopher?s are always pleased with any donation, and always so thankful.


Louisa.

spark67 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a shelter charity shop on Walworth road,

> and one near the post office site in camberwell

> (tho this could be the one from Walworth that has

> moved) Seemed reasonable to me.



I think the Walworth Road and Camberwell shops are in aid of Crisis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They're a fringe party with totally leftfield policies. No one actually wants them in government and by the time of the next general election everyone will see them for who they are.    Their leader even offered a hypnotherapy session to a lady to increase the size of her breasts.  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/zack-polanski-green-party-hypnotherapy-b2819071.html They are total cranks, just like Reform.   
    • What do you base those statements on?
    • I suppose I'd assume that Councillor McCash, who is, as I recall, a self-confessed revolutionary Marxist, had hoped to take Southwark Labour down his chosen route - when he lost his leadership bid he must then have been looking for a party which shared his ultra-left views (ultra-left at least in the light of Starmer's interpretation of socialism). The Greens, for him, clearly fit that role. After that his timing was all about benefiting his chosen (new) party - at least he didn't stand for Labour and then defect giving the Greens an unexpected 3 year seat. As someone who doesn't share the wings of his political position I don't wish him well (politically) - but neither do I wish him ill as a 'punishment' for his defection.  
    • Agree with all the sentiments above. Hope it doesn't change too much and above all I really hope it stays independent and avoids becoming the same as all the chain pubs in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...