Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?



The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or the one near the station, Clothes for Causes, which I always thought was more of a lifestyle support system for someone who wanted to build a profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?


There was one called Give and Take next to EDT which became Question Air and has now changed its name to something else

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> > clothes and closed - with a questionable

> business

> > model?

>


>

> The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or

> the one near the station, Clothes for Causes,

> which I always thought was more of a lifestyle

> support system for someone who wanted to build a

> profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.



The one with the questionable business model was Give and Take, now closed.


Though maybe Clothes for Causes did as well.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a lot of time of most of our local charity

> shops, but one in particular, is extremely rude

> and not very charitable at all. Hopefully the new

> one will be nice like most of the others.

>

> Louisa.




Would that be the smallest one, by any chance?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The floor space isn?t huge inside, but some of the

> egos that help out are. One particular member of

> staff is incredibly rude and doesn?t even try to

> hide it.

>



Is this the shop which has been discussed on here before due to weird random exclusions of particular items from offers publicised in the shop?

Yes Sue it is. And I know people have suggested previously that some of the helpers may have certain health related issues, but there is no excuse for rummaging through a donated bag of goods in front of customers and the person kind enough to donate them, and suggesting said donated items are not wanted or they have too much already. It?s iust plain rude. If someone is kind enough to donate, these people should at least show some gratitude. The lovely people at St Christopher?s are always pleased with any donation, and always so thankful.


Louisa.

spark67 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a shelter charity shop on Walworth road,

> and one near the post office site in camberwell

> (tho this could be the one from Walworth that has

> moved) Seemed reasonable to me.



I think the Walworth Road and Camberwell shops are in aid of Crisis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...