Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH

>

> Convicted Fraudster Yaxley-Lennon is as honest as

> the day is long.


Have you noticed how the nights are drawing in?

  • 10 months later...

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is it that the news media always call him

> Tommy Robinson, but then without fail state that

> his real name is SYL within a couple of lines?

>

> There are plenty of other people in public life

> who operate under an assumed name that they don?t

> do this for:


Perhaps because those others aren?t in court, where people are identified by their real names?

To be fair, they are pretty much all variations on their given names, most commonly using their middle name instead of the first name. As for George Osborne, if my parents had called me Gideon, I'm not sure it would have taken me as long as that to change it by deed-poll.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite a few UK politicians have not used their given names

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-politicians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73


They're all using their given surname, and either their middle name or a nickname as the first name.


"Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so quoting his real name alongside it seems fair.


Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?

9 and a half weeks is all he'll serve


9 Months given. 4 and a half to serve (I thought that would be if he showed good behavior but seems it's how it is), 2 months +already served.


He's been let off easy even though he claims he'll be murdered in jail (he won't be)

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite a few UK politicians have not used their

> given names

> >

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-pol

> iticians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73

>

> They're all using their given surname, and either

> their middle name or a nickname as the first

> name.

>

> "Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so quoting

> his real name alongside it seems fair.

>

> Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?


According to Wiki (ermmm) "The name Tommy Robinson is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew, which follows Luton Town Football Club.[38] The member named Tommy Robinson wrote two books about his 25 years of hooliganism"

"his cause"....all he has done is highlight the activities of certain muslims ...if you wish to learn more watch Three Girls the docudrama about Rochdale groomers...on Netflix- and it was made by the BBC...a 3 part mini series. And the perps are STILL in the UK as they have a Human Right to a family life according to the EC

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fishbiscuits Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > uncleglen Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Quite a few UK politicians have not used

> their

> > given names

> > >

> >

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-pol

>

> > iticians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73

> >

> > They're all using their given surname, and

> either

> > their middle name or a nickname as the first

> > name.

> >

> > "Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so

> quoting

> > his real name alongside it seems fair.

> >

> > Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?

>

> According to Wiki (ermmm) "The name Tommy Robinson

> is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of

> the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew,

> which follows Luton Town Football Club.[38] The

> member named Tommy Robinson wrote two books about

> his 25 years of hooliganism"

> "his cause"....all he has done is highlight the

> activities of certain muslims ...if you wish to

> learn more watch Three Girls the docudrama about

> Rochdale groomers...on Netflix- and it was made by

> the BBC...a 3 part mini series. And the perps are

> STILL in the UK as they have a Human Right to a

> family life according to the EC



Hideous comments - not even a prerence this time. Maybe emboldened by a Boris/Trump world.

Tommy Robinson, or rather Stephen Yaxley-Lennon hasn't merely highlighted the activities of certain muslims. He has led a crusade to bait gullible hooligans to hate ALL muslims. He does not care about the victims of CSA. He has used them to fuel his real agenda which is a crusade against an entire religion. And yes, why is the vile apologism of Uncleglen still here?
And just to add that anyone in central London today, around Westminster would have seen what despicable thugs follow the likes of Tommy Robinson. Up to 200 hooligans attacked the remain protesters outside Parliament and the press at College Green. These are not people who believe in freedom of speech or difference of opinion. They are boot boys who beat the crap out of anyone with a different view. So Uncleglen, you can go do one with your defence of a rabble rousing thug who today, got just what he has been asking for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...