Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I presume you're referring to the Guardian article at the weekend? Jon Moulton has a point although I think it could take some time to play out.


Mizuho and Bank of America provided 100% of the debt for BC Partners' acquisition in the expectation that they would be able to bring other banks in (i.e. syndicate) later to share the exposure. However, from news articles in August, it looks like they are struggling to interest other banks due to a combination of (a) the general turbulence in the markets (b) this deal looks particularly highly-leveraged and © the return on the loan now looks inadequate. The banks can attempt to fix © by offering some more money to prospective partner banks but only up to a certain point.


BC Partners probably has a few options - not least of which is to ignore it since it's legally the banks' problem.


However, coming back to Moulton's arguments, Foxtons is unlikely to come a cropper unless it trips a banking covenant. Under its current debt structure, it will not have to repay any of its debt for at least 7 years. It should be relatively protected from higher interest rates. It is also likely that its covenant package is pretty weak. All of this means that even if Foxtons doesn't perform as expected, which I would have thought is quite likely, it is likely to have a grace period before it gets serious.


Of course, if they've really stuffed up their business plans or documentation then it could come tumbling down much quicker e.g. the acquisition of Esporta gyms took only 6 months to go tits up!



 

Yes, so far as I can tell at the moment and without any inside information. However, it would not be unusual for interest cover to be tight at the start of a deal, increasing as growth provides additional cashflows. If this growth doesn't appear ...


Also, Mizuho and Bank of America might also be pushing for some more lender-friendly terms to enable them to sell down their debt (even though they might not have the legal right to get these terms from BC Partners). This could lead to the deal structure changing.


Finally, Foxtons is a relatively small deal compared to some that are in a similar position e.g. Boots, AA, Intelsat (where BC Partners paid $5bn for a majority stake).

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Financial journalists seem to have settled on ?290m for the price BC Partners paid for the 20 branches of Foxtons. At an average price of ?14.5m per branch commentators are saying that BC Partners overpaid and the Foxtons business model is now likely to collapse given the costs of re-financing the loans used to purchase Foxtons and the slump in the housing market.


Has anyone seen any glum faces in East Dulwich Foxtons recently?

Oooh mikeb, a man in the know. Where should I invest the hundred or so pounds I am gonna save by not being fleeced for buying ridiculously expensive bread (see other topic!)


I am walking past Foxtons later, I shall look in and smile at the staff and get a free cuppa out of them maybe as I pretend to be interested in ?300,000 ex council flats....!

I've seen ?390m as well, from Reuters. Total acquisition debt package was ?260m


According to the Telegraph today, Countrywide estate agents (Bairstow Eve, John D Wood, Mann Group) seems to be having some difficulties. Its financing structure is broadly similar to Foxtons, although probably has even fewer restrictions. So if the article is right, this could suggest that Foxtons could also be facing problems sooner rather than later.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Did anyone read the article about Foxtons and its founder in the FT this weekend? It pretty much explains the whole situation with the company at the minute, and also the hefty sum which jon hunt (founder) made upon selling the company last year to BC partners. Even though foxtons financial situation is other than stable, i very much doubt they will be closing down soon - despite them arriving in ED during uncertain economic times, they are very well established and are leaders in their market although only operating in London and the South West.

Good article in the FT Weekend - made interesting reading. I think one fact sums it up - that Foxtons annual interest payments on the BC partners loans are more than their 2006 profit (which was a good year). And they only have 8 years to pay it back. In a falling market. And they have no real assets other than the odd freehold, commercial leases on their 21 hideous branches. And 79 green mini coopers. Their founders sell out last summer was so perfectly timed, it makes me feel queasy.


B**%%&!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...