Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am furious. I have just seen one of the Alleyn's grounds staff blowing leaves and debris from their garden in the grounds of the school, through the railings, onto the pavement and curb of Hillsborough Road. I asked him what would happen to the debris, he replied "the council will pick it up". I know that the Southwark Street cleaning team have cleaned and swept the road and pavements here in the last two weeks, it was looking spotless. I would have thought that a business such as Alleyn's who can afford plenty of grounds staff and equipment could be more responsible for their own waste. Not very neighbourly and costs local residents more in taxes. Any suggestions as to whom I can contact?


 

I would report them to both the school and the council.


My friend worked for Southwark Environmental Services, cleaning the streets and it's grinding work. They would be inspected and told off if an area they had said they'd cleaned was obviously not (natural additions excepted).


https://www.southwark.gov.uk/street-care

I would probably choose Report Dumped Rubbish

Typically selfish and ignorant behaviour from Alleyn's (and those working for them) yet again. We live close by too and have struggled for years with their unwillingness to consider the residents who live nearby. Perhaps a report might do the trick, but without wanting to sound too pessimistic, I have found the blame just gets pushed backwards and forwards and nothing is ever actually chased up. Good luck!

Alleyns really don?t give two figs for anyone but themselves, and they never have.


The rot set in under the headmaster Colin Niven, as unpleasant a money-obsessed piece of work as you could have the misfortune to encounter, who told a parent of my acquaintance ?This is a business, not a school?.


If you don?t spend money with them, they?ll ignore you.

Look at in a more balance manner please.


1. The trees are the Council's responsibility.

2. The Council chose this species of tree (London Plane)

3. This species is deciduous.

4. The leaves from the trees fall on the pavement and into surrounding properties.

5. This species also sheds bark huge numbers of fluffy seed balls which provoke hay fever.

6. This debris clogs up the drains every year in the Autumn.


The Council would have saved a massive amount of money if they had chosen to plant a species that didnt come with all this baggage.


Why knock Alleyn's when it is a problem the Council chose to create?

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Look at in a more balance manner please.

>

> 1. The trees are the Council's responsibility.


But this is to do with leaves etc from plants *on Alleyns property*, which are Alleyns responsibility to dispose of.


> 2. The Council chose this species of tree (London

> Plane)

> 3. This species is deciduous.

> 4. The leaves from the trees fall on the pavement

> and into surrounding properties.

> 5. This species also sheds bark huge numbers of

> fluffy seed balls which provoke hay fever.

> 6. This debris clogs up the drains every year in

> the Autumn.


None of that has anything to do with the plants *on Alleyns property*.


>

> The Council would have saved a massive amount of

> money if they had chosen to plant a species that

> didnt come with all this baggage.

>


Probably, but that?s a different conversation.




> Why knock Alleyn's when it is a problem the

> Council chose to create?


Well, because this is nothing to do with the councils trees?



The OP *specifically* refers to an Alleyns employee blowing debris from fauna on Alleyns property out onto the street and nonchalantly expecting the council to pick it up.


Sorry, but I would respectfully suggest you?ve misunderstood the OP.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> The OP *specifically* refers to an Alleyns

> employee blowing debris from fauna on Alleyns

> property out onto the street and nonchalantly

> expecting the council to pick it up.

>

> Sorry, but I would respectfully suggest you?ve

> misunderstood the OP.


Don't think so. The photo doesn't lie. The photo shows the guy with the blower is on the pavement and cannot therefor be blowing the leaves and debris through the railings out on to the pavement.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> >

> > The OP *specifically* refers to an Alleyns

> > employee blowing debris from fauna on Alleyns

> > property out onto the street and nonchalantly

> > expecting the council to pick it up.

> >

> > Sorry, but I would respectfully suggest you?ve

> > misunderstood the OP.

>

> Don't think so. The photo doesn't lie.


I love the idea that you think a photo tells an exact tale! For all we know that?s just a photo of the individual concerned after they finished their work.


The photo

> shows the guy with the blower is on the pavement

> and cannot therefor be blowing the leaves and

> debris through the railings out on to the

> pavement.


In which case there is a discrepancy between the visual image of the photo and the written words of the OP.


?I have just seen one of the Alleyn's grounds staff blowing leaves and debris from their garden in the grounds of the school, through the railings, onto the pavement and curb of Hillsborough Road. I asked him what would happen to the debris, he replied "the council will pick it up".


The way I read that, an Alleyns employee is blowing flora debris out of the school grounds and onto the street, presumably in order to avoid having to take and bag the leaves etc. If so, that?s pretty poor.


Hopefully the OP can come back on here to clarify exactly what they saw.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tomdhu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------


> >

> > Don't think so. The photo doesn't lie.

>

> I love the idea that you think a photo tells an

> exact tale! For all we know that?s just a photo of

> the individual concerned after they finished their

> work.

>

> The photo

> > shows the guy with the blower is on the

> pavement

> > and cannot therefor be blowing the leaves and

> > debris through the railings out on to the

> > pavement.

>

> In which case there is a discrepancy between the

> visual image of the photo and the written words of

> the OP.

>

> ?I have just seen one of the Alleyn's grounds

> staff blowing leaves and debris from their garden

> in the grounds of the school, through the

> railings, onto the pavement and curb of

> Hillsborough Road. I asked him what would happen

> to the debris, he replied "the council will pick

> it up".

>

> The way I read that, an Alleyns employee is

> blowing flora debris out of the school grounds and

> onto the street, presumably in order to avoid

> having to take and bag the leaves etc. If so,

> that?s pretty poor.

>

> Hopefully the OP can come back on here to clarify

> exactly what they saw.


Absolutely! The photo indicates there is a severe credibility issue in the OP.


If the guy had finished blowing the leaves out through the railings, why would he be outside the railings?


There appears to be no trees inside the railings ( I will check tomorrow) so he couldn't be blowing out leaves and debris that originated inside Alleyns.


Could it be that the OP has an old axe to grind?

tomdhu

>

> Absolutely! The photo indicates there is a severe

> credibility issue in the OP.

>

> If the guy had finished blowing the leaves out

> through the railings, why would he be outside the

> railings?

>

> There appears to be no trees inside the railings (

> I will check tomorrow) so he couldn't be blowing

> out leaves and debris that originated inside

> Alleyns.

>

> Could it be that the OP has an old axe to grind?



Do you work for Alleyns or something?


You seem intent on deliberately ignoring what the OP *wrote*, instead focusing on the photo and somehow believing that tells the whole story.


Do you have a particular axe to grind against the council? Because that?s all you came on this thread to do.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Could it be that the OP has an old axe to grind?


Perhaps in the interests of disclosure, if you're accusing others of grinding axes, you should mention that you're an old Alleynian?

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tomdhu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Could it be that the OP has an old axe to

> grind?

>

> Perhaps in the interests of disclosure, if you're

> accusing others of grinding axes, you should

> mention that you're an old Alleynian?


Wrong again Rendel.

A few leaves- how absolutely precious! If you people are so anti-public- school (because let's face it- you are) why don't you go and live in another area.

One of my in-laws used to turn red with rage every time I mentioned that my intelligent child went to Alleyn's on a government assisted place - paid for by the TAX payer- including her. I suppose I should have ferried my kid to a grammar school in Kent like Harriet Harman did!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...