Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Edited to add - sorry StraferJack for not using quotation marks which I guess did affect the story - it was because the mother used such an extraordingary phrase that I remember it so well - it was after all quite a few years ago. And the pub was completely empty - we sat by the fire and it was about 11.00am - maybe we were in 'their spot'. I don't actually smoke because I don't wish to upset MY lungs.

I've got kids and a 4 year old granddaughter so am definitely not anti-kids, but I think the problem comes when the parents of young kids don't know how to, or dont want to, tell their kids off when they are annoying other people.


I've been in a situation where I was in the Plough and a kid kept throwing food and running about smearing soggy chips around the place. The parents failed to say anything to the kid, so when he came up to me brandishing a soggy chip with ketchup all over him, I shouted 'no, put that down!' at him quite sharply before he smeared it all over my leg. It stopped him in his tracks but the patents then scooped him up and tutted loudly at me!


If they are not going to tell their kids off for being annoying, how can they complain if someone else does it for them?


I didn't stay much longer after that because I didn't want to get into an argument with them and spoil my day.

In the last couple of weeks I have been in Si Mangia and the Rose. There were families with children in each of these establishments. The children were very well behaved, I think because these were proper family outings arranged for the benefit of the children as well as the parents where the parents (and their friends) were interacting actively during the meal with their children. Of course, these establishments, like all others, also have naughty children, but the annoyance to others does seem to arise when the children are left to their own devices. As in everything else, there are, of course, exceptions.


I agree that mutual tolerance is the answer, but not to the extent that parents should expect some-one to leave the pub or restaurant in question because their child is annoying that person and others by their bad behaviour.


I do not know whether this is still the case, and I am not saying I agree with the policy, but at one stage Wetherspoons would allow parents with children to have one drink only after their meal and they then had to leave. Apparently this was because the children, having had their meal, started running round the pub. This involved the staff spending much time in having to deal with these issues to the detriment of service to other customers.

Someone doesnt think pubs are just for adults:


Many as are the virtues of the Moon Under Water, I think that the garden is its best feature, because it allows whole families to go there instead of Mum having to stay at home and mind the baby while Dad goes out alone. And though, strictly speaking, they are only allowed in the garden, the children tend to seep into the pub and even to fetch drinks for their parents. This, I believe, is against the law, but it is a law that deserves to be broken, for it is the puritanical nonsense of excluding children ?and therefore, to some extent, women?from pubs that has turned these places into mere boozing-shops instead of the family gathering-places that they ought to be.

- George Orwell

Although I believe that the government should not be able to tell us where to hunt and who to eat I believe babies smoking 'wacky backy' is taking this all a step to far to be honest. They would all probably just go and join the Occupy movement.

Bert Shackleton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My mum used to give me gin when I was a baby and I

> have grown up fine. Don't really see what all the

> fuss is about. If people want to take their

> babies to the pub for a drink then they should be

> able to without the nanny state interfering.



You lost me at the phrase "nanny state". You might as well go the whole hog now and say "PC gone mad!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...