Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beware this evening - there is a little scumbag on a stolen yellow OFO bike cruising East Dulwich Road trying to steal phones out of peoples hands.

I was walking past the petrol station and he cruised past me slowly looking back, then crossed the road, sped up and tried to snatch a phone out of a guys hand at the playpark traffic lights. Gave chase, but he got away down towards the Gowlett.

Black teenager, around 16/17 yo

Black hoodie pulled up

Black trackies

Black trainers


Tried calling 101 but with the carnival on.... no joy.


Be careful. Or be daring and knock him off his bike.....

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> East Dulwich Road and roads off of it have always

> been dodgy.

>

> Crystal Palace Rd. Adys Rd. Gowlett Rd. All dodgy

> after dark. and even during the day.

> Too many cut throughs and places to disappear.


That?s ridiculous, we?re on Adys and it?s absolutely fine. As is Crystal Palace Rd. Also with car parked both sides, plenty of street trees and regular traffic I?d have thought getting to pedestrins on these roads would be tough.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> East Dulwich Road and roads off of it have always

> been dodgy.

>

> Crystal Palace Rd. Adys Rd. Gowlett Rd. All dodgy

> after dark. and even during the day.

> Too many cut throughs and places to disappear.

>

>

> DulwichFox


Sorry Fox but you've got a hangup about this, they're no worse than any other parts of ED. Take a look at the Met's regional crime maps and you'll see.


On another note, those hire bikes are a bloody nuisance and the sooner they're banned the better. Fortunately it looks as though they might be gone soon anyway: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/25/mobike-no-more-dockless-bikes-could-soon-be-gone-from-uk-streets

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > East Dulwich Road and roads off of it have

> always

> > been dodgy.

> >

> > Crystal Palace Rd. Adys Rd. Gowlett Rd. All

> dodgy

> > after dark. and even during the day.

> > Too many cut throughs and places to disappear.

>

> >

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> Sorry Fox but you've got a hangup about this,

> they're no worse than any other parts of ED. Take

> a look at the Met's regional crime maps and you'll

> see.

>

> On another note, those hire bikes are a bloody

> nuisance and the sooner they're banned the better.

> Fortunately it looks as though they might be gone

> soon anyway:

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/25/mo

> bike-no-more-dockless-bikes-could-soon-be-gone-fro

> m-uk-streets



Yes those OFO bikes seem to have become the preferred transport of dodgy youth who haven't got their paws on a moped yet-

The other day of Rye Lane I got circled by some youths on OFO bikes, they hesitated when I stopeed at a busy bus stop, nodded to each other and headed down a side street

FFS.


This is London.


I walk alone late at night all round here.


It's fine. As with anywhere at night, or indeed during the day, you have to be aware of what's going on around you.


If you don't want to do that, go and live in the middle of nowhere, or else live in London and never venture out of your house.


FFS. Again :))


ETA: In case it's not obvious, this is in answer to alarmist posts on here ....

Yesterday I saw one of these bikes propped against a wall on the corner of Wood Vale and Lordship Lane. Where are these yellow bikes picked up from? Is it the local train stations? Are they really needed in an area where transport links are so good? These bikes are manna from heaven for unscrupulous little g*ts!
The Chinese are obviously far more respectful. It's probably to do with upbringing and clearly knowing right from wrong. It does say on the OFO website "leave OFO bikes anywhere that traditional bike parking is allowed"! In this case obviously against someone's garden wall!

bcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My original post wasn?t alarmist. It was warning

> people of an incident literally 20 minutes

> beforehand in case it happened again.


I didn't mean you!


I meant people saying whole areas round here were dangerous!


You can get mugged anywhere, it's bad luck but it doesn't mean everybody should always avoid that area forever.

savvygirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Chinese are obviously far more respectful.

> It's probably to do with upbringing and clearly

> knowing right from wrong.


And nothing to do with the fear engendered by living in a militarised dictatorship, I'm sure.

joom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are millions of abandoned ?share bikes? in

> China...

> https://www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2018/ma

> y/01/unexpected-beauty-china-bicycle-graveyards-sh

> are-bikes-in-pictures?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



Oh wow - I suppose they abandon them in artful poses then :)


Back on topic - I'm going to keep my eye out - I'm a bit careless walking home late. I've had a few encounters that I've just dismissed but maybe I was lucky.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Safe ??

>

> See attached photo to see why I still get scared

> around here.

>

> Fox

>

> ETA I was knocked unconscious, Robbed, and left

> for dead.

> And it's getting a lot worse



This is horrendous - when did this happen?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...