Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

From the makers of wanted, how bad does this sound?


"All Creatures Great and Small" (not the James Herriot stuff)


Wanted screenwriters Michael Brandt and Derek Haas have drafted a script for Sony and producer Neal Moritz and his Original Film titled All Creatures Great and Small, says The Hollywood Reporter.


It is set in a world where the animals control the planet and humans are the minority.


Brandt said "Creatures" is a "big, fun, fantastic 'Jurassic Park'-type movie. Because of people's inability to quench their thirst for oil and consumption of resources, we basically ruin the planet, and the planet fights back," Brandt said. "And part of that is the quick evolution of many of the animals."

Watched Zodiac last night - David Fincher's film on the serial killer operating in the Bay Area through the 60s and 70s and who was never caught


Absolutely loved it - great performances all around, and a fantastic sequence which shows a time-lapsed construction of one of San Francisco's iconic buildings thrown in. Some gruesome scences (in particular, the stabbing of one couple is particularly uncomfortable given recen forum discussions) but thoroughly recommended

Makes notes to look out for "In Bruges", "Tell NO One" and "Number 23". Lovefilm list needs updating.


Anyone seen "the Queen". Not totally impressed by it but loved it for two parts: the Queen breaking down in here Land Rover in the middle of a stream, then breaking down, emotionally. And the scenes of her seeing the flowers outside Balmoral. Saintly Helen Mirren.

  • 5 weeks later...

The top 10 films thread got me thinking about some I've seen recently. Too new to be in the top 10, but Infamous was very good. Not the first film about Truman Capote, but very well written and acted!


The Good Shepherd, directed by Robert De Niro, and starring Matt Damon, and a good supporting cast (including Bobby D). It's about American Intelligence (I know I know) and the formation of the CIA. Clever film, and definitely one you have to sit and watch. I tried making a cup of tea, and had to rewind to keep up with what had happened.

I saw Batman last weekend.

It was a bit meh to be honest, and though not really oscar worthy apart from being dead, Heath Ledger's Joker was far and away the highlight of the film, especially in that wig.


I enjoyed the film, it's just within ten minutes of it finishing you can't really remember why you enjoyed it, and the next day you just can't really remember anything about it.


Recent cinematic successes for me, I actually really enjoyed Wall-E despite myself, and Persepolis was bally excellent.

I liked The Dark Knight too. Over-long car chases and fights, but I always say that about action movies. Heath Ledger and Aaron Eckhart were very good, Christian Bale was jumpable - oddly, Maggie Gyllenhall (sp?) was a bit disappointing. But the big set-piece action bits were good - I liked the ferry situation.

Haven't been to the cinema for a few weeks, but I'll offer a DVD recommendation, two films which should be watched in sequence, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset. There was a 9 year gap between them being released and I hadn't heard of them when they came out, but they were my third pick on a three for ?20 offer in HMV earlier this year and I couldn't recommend them more highly


Romances but so far removed from the typical syrupy sweet American rom coms, actually seem kind of believable, if I were to get mushy, I'd say the kind of stuff I dream about.


The first of the two is one of those rare films to ever be rated 100% on rotten tomatoes:-


http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/before_sunrise/


and the follow up was still pretty highly rated


http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/before_sunset/


I really wanted to see "In search of a midnight kiss" which came out this year and sounded like it would be similar in style, but I didn't get round to it, so that will have to be another one for the DVD list.

  • 3 weeks later...

We watched Sunshine last night - another Danny Boyle film directed from an Alex Garland script (see also 28 Days Later)

Lady Mac is always "resistant" to sci-fi flicks anyway, and this one is a slow build. But a terrific film. Based on board a Manhattan-sized carrier, bound for the sun to re-ignite that dying star, these 8 people represent mankinds last chance...


As well as teh narrative it manages to incorportae several 21st century concerns - and even if it does become melodramatic at the end, it's still a great film. And gorgeous to look at

We have it on our lovefilm list. Look forward.


We just saw "Notes on a Scandal" which is from a book of the same name by Zoe Heller. I couldn't get into the book - just too multilayered for my impoverished brain, but the film was superb, driven on in the main by a terrific performance by the magnificent Judi Dench. Recommended.

  • 2 weeks later...
watched the latest george a romero film last night, the usual zombie splatter fest but all the same a wee bit disappointing. unusual twist in it, in that a few of the bods in the film who didnt get bitten still turned into zombies. still worth seeing however if only for the zombie "fishbowl" scene.

A couple of gooduns on the plane.

Quite enjoyed Forbidden Kingdom for light hearted, monkey meets karate kid, kung-fu fare.

Guilty pleasure was the rubbish but made me laugh You don't mess with the Zohan.


Genuinely good with some laugh out loud moments was Son of Rambow, and only got through 20 minutes before I had to stop watching, hungover on a long haul with a dose of the fear was not the right time, but I will watch it, oh yes I will...was The Orphanage .. eeek!

I saw Kings of Kong last night - oh me oh my. A whole cinema tent full of people howling, booing, hissing, cheering - it was the best documentary I have seen in ages. Ok, some of you might think 2 grown men fighting for 20 years about the highest score in Donkey Kong is pathetic. Which it might be, but do not mistake the film about the for the same. Genius

Ooh, did anyone see Bring Back Star Wars last night? I quite enjoyed it.

I almost cried when the chap who played Lando was talking about how the saarlac pit was like a ladies woo woo and Justin said to him "are you talking about Return of the Jedi or return of the Japs Eye, are we discussing the same film?" Lando carries on for a bit and then did a double take "what the hell is Return of the Japs Eye?" Classic!!

  • 3 weeks later...

paragon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Watched Atonement last night. Thought is was

> good. Can't get over how annoying Keira K is and

> not sure how well cast James McAvoy was (although

> think he is normally good). Some of it I thought

> was a bit cringey but on the whole thought that

> the supporting cast were excellent and some young

> stars will be made. Wish I had read the book

> first as comparison but sure I wouldn't have liked

> it as much if I had.



Watched Atonement last night, and agree with a lot of what Paragon says above. I do think Keira Knightly is a good actress, but has a really annoying self assurance about her that I find off putting. Thought both acresses playing Briony Tallis were very good, and amazingly cast in terms of looks (actually there were 3 playing her if you include Redgave at the end, but I mean the younger 2).


I did think it was visually stunning, particularly the Dunkirk bit, what a set! Basically though I found myself just getting in to it as it was ending. Wanted the story to go somewhere else.


All in all a decent watch, and well done, but I guess it just wasn't really my thing.


Lovefilm now sending me No Country for Old Men which I'm really looking forward to seeing.

Like I said, I don't sign she's the worst actress out there, just a bit of a cocky cow. What annoys me is that she would be far far more attractive if she was at least a stone heavier. Some women are naturally bone thin, she doesn't look like one of them, don't know why she wants to be that thin!

She doesn't strike me as being much of a media whore, at least no more than her career demands, and maintains her privacy where possible. Contrasted against the raft of talented nobodies who genuinely plague the fabric of modern life, she don't* look so bad all of a sudden.


Mind you I've yet to be convinced she's especially talented bar her obvious prettiness, which agreed would be improved given a pie or two.




*yes, I know it's 'doesn't' for all those on the grammar thread.

No Country For Old Men is a good one. It's not my favourite Coen brothers one, but it's still very good.


Tend to agree with the general consensus on Keira Knightley... good looking, would look better with a few extra kilos, not such a great actress - but not in the same league of crapness as Keanu Reeves or Liz Hurley, for example.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...