Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I feel like I am missing out on a huge secret!I do not read newspapers ( as it is one person giving their version of the truth and I do not like the influence the media has) so I guess I shall remain in the dark about this big secret!

I think we all have a few skeletons in our closets anyway!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59360
Share on other sites

let's not get carried away HeidiHi - it's the South London Press we are talking about here. Calling it a newspaper is stretching things a bit


On the media thing in general, scepticism is wise but self-defeating if taken too far. Every version of any event we hear about, from any source be it paper, telly or friend is one person's version of events. So long as you treat a newspaper as a.n. other source it all helps to get a bigger picture


I trust newspapers (well - some of the grown-up ones anyway) far more than I trust ANY TV news - it frightens me to think the TV is where most people get their news from

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59364
Share on other sites

It is a paper, it tells the news, thus newspaper!

I don't watch TV either! I only watch Strictly come dancing and Heroes and that is my lot.

I do agree that all information is someone elses version but the media DOES influence too many people and you cannot disagree there!


Ignorance is bliss and that is where I shall remain...Blissful!





Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> let's not get carried away HeidiHi - it's the

> South London Press we are talking about here.

> Calling it a newspaper is stretching things a bit

>

> On the media thing in general, scepticism is wise

> but self-defeating if taken too far. Every version

> of any event we hear about, from any source be it

> paper, telly or friend is one person's version of

> events. So long as you treat a newspaper as a.n.

> other source it all helps to get a bigger picture

>

> I trust newspapers (well - some of the grown-up

> ones anyway) far more than I trust ANY TV news -

> it frightens me to think the TV is where most

> people get their news from

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59369
Share on other sites

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a silly position. I've no idea how to

> respond to that.



Is that message aimed at me?


Then I shall remain 'silly' I have no interest in reading about every politican, celeb or Tom, Dick and Harry, I have my own life to be getting on with.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59372
Share on other sites

it's not silly at all, i believe buddhists state that there are 2 equally moral or valid positions when it comes to keeping abreast of stuff.


you can pay attention to the world and it's woes, involve yourself in it and do something about it. Or you can choose to ignore it all. to keep abreast of stuff and do nothing is where a lot of modern angst comes from.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59374
Share on other sites

jim_the_chin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's not silly at all, i believe buddhists state

> that there are 2 equally moral or valid positions

> when it comes to keeping abreast of stuff.

>

> you can pay attention to the world and it's woes,

> involve yourself in it and do something about it.

> Or you can choose to ignore it all. to keep

> abreast of stuff and do nothing is where a lot of

> modern angst comes from.




Ahhh you are a wise man!! (tu) I agree exactly! I used to read papers but reading about murders, wars and such and being unable to do anything about it just got me really angry so I would rather not know! The news was worse, the amount of times I listened to all the stuff going on and being flabbergasted was not good for my blood pressure, so basically I just focus on my life and the things I have control over.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59376
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey Chav - hold your head up. Not a bad article,

> you certainly weren't castigated. We all have a

> past that wouldn't bear scrutiny. You have been

> honest which is the main criteria for a politician

> in my view and I'll still buy you a drink. Good

> luck. PGC


Couldn't agree more. I look forward to buying your autobiography at a later date!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/3/#findComment-59380
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...