Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I walk my dog in Sydenham woods every now and then. A few weeks ago a blue tarpaulin appeared down near the old railway line. Had a closer look today and saw a guy sleeping under it surrounded by bags.


I've always thought if I ever became homeless I'd rather set up camp in the woods and build a decent shelter than roam ypthe streets.


Has anyone spoken to him? A part of me feels like donating some more tarp to help extend his camp whilst another part wonders if it is unlawful setting up shelter in the woods?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21161-man-camping-in-sydenham-woods/
Share on other sites

Hope he's OK. He obviously needs help. I have a friend who's been homeless for a while now and been sleeping rough but has been too proud/polite to some offers of help and is now not responding to calls on his mobile phone. Could you give us a description at all please?

He was covered over with sleeping bags and I didn't want to disturb him, so no description. However, I was slightly worried I might get a barrage of abuse from hyacinth bucket types - reassuring not to!


So tomorrow when we go for a walk I will take him some more tarp and a pack lunch. I'll let you know who he is, if hes happy to be known...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems a bit odd to me.

>

> It would not be possible to live and survive in

> Dulwich Wood.

>

> He would need to come out for any food / water.

>

> He would need money. ??? would need an address to

> get benefits. ???

>

> Fox.




Can't work out if you are just trying to wind people up or really didn't think this one through.


Never seen homeless people begging? Or heard of people with no fixed abode getting benefits.

I have a hunch he works. There's very little in the way of possessions or anything tatty. Just a tarp, a chair, a man and a smart travel bag. Like I said, if I was without a roof, I'd sooner seek refuge in the woods than town.


I will report back tomorrow after my walk...if he's from overseas I'm gonna struggle unless he's French ( gcse level) or polish (super basic level, like, how are you: na dobra)


Any budding translators out there willing to help out?!

Jah Lush: we've just got back from the woods. We didn't ask his name as I think he was a little bewildered by 2 strangers and a dog turning up with provisions. We took him some extra warm clothes and more tarp with some food and a hot drink.


We only had a brief chat (he wished us a happy new year!), but we think he had an English accent, possibly Manchester or Liverpool. At least my mrs did but she's south African. I couldn't his accent at all.


We reckon he's about 30, dark shaved hair, bit of stubble. Can't tell height as he was lying down. Had big boots on, like caterpillars maybe.


We're gonna go again tomorrow so hopefully he won't be as bewildered. Will let you know his name if it comes up.

Your mate not called Patrick is he? We helped another guy without a roof called Patrick. About 5 foot 4. We tried the mayors scheme of no second night, which for the record, sucks! It was his promise that no-one should spend more than 2 nights homeless. But all they told us we could do was take him to the British museum and MAYBE an outreach group MIGHT come.


I'm always reluctant to hand out money. Food, drink, some clothes not a problem. Just way, way too few shelters.


I think the guy in the woods has got it pretty well sussed out!

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Seems a bit odd to me.

> >

> > It would not be possible to live and survive

> in

> > Dulwich Wood.

> >

> > He would need to come out for any food / water.

>

> >

> > He would need money. ??? would need an address

> to

> > get benefits. ???

> >

> > Fox.

>

>

>

> Can't work out if you are just trying to wind

> people up or really didn't think this one

> through.

>

> Never seen homeless people begging? Or heard of

> people with no fixed abode getting benefits.



What are you talking about.


I simply pointed out that this chap could not survive in the wood.

He would need Food and water.

Would need money to buy food.


Was that too difficult for you to comprehend. ???(!)



The fact that he has choosen to live a hermit life is his choice.

Leave the Guy alone.


If he has a mobile phone then Presumable he has somewhere where he can get it charged.


If he wanted to draw attention to himself he would not be hiding in the Woods.


Fox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...