Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The impact appears to have crushed a down pipe. However only the front (engine) box was crumpled - it looked like the passenger compartment wasn't - so hopefully injuries will have been light. I can't imagine it would be possible to drive through that narrow gap at any speed anyway. Cars are now built to crumple easily as a safety factor, so perhaps the impact speed was low.

There was another car a few weeks ago which had crashed sidewards into the flats opposite Sainsbury?s on dog kennel hill . The little road facing the exit from Sainsbury?s.

It had crashed side ways on through a small wall , I just don?t know how it managed to get in that position either ?

There are some clues as to what might have happened if you look closely enough. The only way to get into that gap is deliberately and the tyres are still inflated, so the kerb was not hit at any speed. The car is a Hybrid and there seems to be a charging cable running to it. My guess is that the car parked there to charge and that the driver, either, more focussed on not blocking the bus stop pavement, drove into the wall, or, having charged the car, got reverse and forward mixed up and hit the accelerator hard enough to cause that damage (I favour the latter personally).
I was there when the car was being towed away - it's quite genuine - or at least the pictures are, and the car was there. I suppose it is possible that it was placed there in that condition e.g. for a film, although the down pipe was definitely crushed. It may have been a relatively low impact piece of vandalism - i.e. not accidental.

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Put on charge when absolutely flat, but still in

> gear? Then once with power, trundled into the

> school. That's not a high-impact; maybe 10-15mph.

> The 'brick' wall will be a single skin clad of

> brickwork.



Yep,that sounds plausible.

Except the impact damage is flat across and not nearside worldwiser. And how do you explain the charger cable?


As exciting as it may be to suspect some high speed shenanigans, look at the clues, A car that mounts a pavement at speed has at least, damaged front wheel tracking, if not a flat. This car was parked. And then something went wrong ;)

> And how do you explain the charger cable?


There are no obvious charge points in the area, unless possibly available inside the leftmost entrance to the school. The lead, whatever it is, seems to coming from the direction of what, if you magnify the first picture, looks as if it it could be the open back door of a recovery or workshop vehicle in the top LH corner.


@Dyson Repairs, is there any possibility of your changing your hot link, to the photo uploaded on your website, to a plain URL? If anyone's interested, the full Daily Mail account of the Edinburgh January 2015 incident is at https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931134/I-know-said-street-parking-ridiculous-Car-ends-nose-crashing-basement-level-building.html.

As usual, there's a degree of speculation here by people claiming to be able to say what happened. As it happens, I was at the scene moments after it happened (the police and ambulance had just arrived). It was around 5 am on Saturday. The car had come out of Melbourne Grove and had continued straight on ? not from down LL as some have suggested. It was not parked there, and there was no charging cable (that appeared later in the day, presumably as part of the effort to remove the car ? and parking it to charge would have been impossible anyway). It had indeed gone through the gap between the bus stop and sign, having pushed the sign slight out of the way. It was a tight fight, but he managed it. There didn't appear to be any serious injuries, but as emergency services were already on scene I didn't offer assistance. It's not possible to say why he missed the junction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
    • Let’s just boycott all chains in favour of local businesses.  Places like Gail’s popping up everywhere has a very damaging impact on small businesses. It’s just the same as the new empanadas place but on a bigger scale. I’ll say it a million times more, we hold the power with our choices. Let’s use our power to look after ourselves and our environment (which includes small local family businesses). And yes, I also love Chacarero.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...