Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think everything good at Spurs is down to

> Harry. With that squad and that chairman, I think

> plenty of managers could come in and keep them on

> the up.


Or completely mess up all the good work that has been done. A new manager would want to bring his own staff in and we'd lose our best players too.

I disagree about prison, too many there already and I don't think non violent criminals should be imprisoned.

IF the state finds him guilty, he should pay it all back and then some, and then be banned from working in football ever again.


If he is found Not Guilty, well that's British Justice.

I think the result will be the usual fudge - you can almost hear the summing up:


"Whilst it is clear that there were monies undeclared that should have been declared, and that the full facts of Mr Redknapp's accounts were not disclosed at the time of the initial investigation, it is far from certain that he himself was aware at the time that what he was doing constituted an offence and that there are a significant number of obfuscating factors and contradictory statements on both sides that only serve to make any decisive verdict in the case of the accused subject to opinion and hearsay and therefore nigh on impossible to reach. This court recommends the due taxes be paid with interest and Mr Redknapp not be allowed to benefit from the sales or purchase of players in the future."

Oo you calling a wheeler dealer??? I'm a f**king brilliant football manager (even if he does say so himself). OOOO you looking at at John, do you know ooo I am. I'll 'ave some of the chaps sort you arht!!!!!


'Arry must think he's in an episode of The Sweeney!! >:D<

In his legal directions, the judge said the jury could not find Redknapp guilty and at the same time acquit Mr Mandaric.


He also said that if Redknapp honestly believed, as he told the court, that tax had been paid on the money by Mandaric on the payments in the United States, he could be acquitted.


?If he honestly believed there was no tax in respect of UK tax, that provides Mr Redknapp with a defence to either or both charges,? the judge said.



Judge is a Spurs fan by the sound of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...