Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?1 a bunch in Sainsbury's the other day.. and penny sweets aren't as cheap as they used to be! I wish to add to my previous comment; stealing these daffs is like stealing penny sweets and then leaving half of the spoils on the floor and the shop in a bit of a mess. It's bang out of order!

iceicebaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The price of daffs this time of year is

> practically free! It's like stealing penny sweets.



So as their resale value is nominal, it's OK to ransack a flowerbed and ruin a public display. As for the other parallel you draw - would anyone think it was Ok for a parent to encourage their child to steal a handful of sweets either?

The price of daffs this time of year is practically free! It's like stealing penny sweets.


I had thought the point being made here was that the objects being stolen were of little monetary value - and therefore that there would be no need to steal what could be so easily legitimately purchased - not that the little value meant that it was OK to steal them. Theft is wrong, theft of something of no value is wrong and pointless. But maybe other posters are reading it right.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The price of daffs this time of year is

> practically free! It's like stealing penny

> sweets.

>

> I had thought the point being made here was that

> the objects being stolen were of little monetary

> value - and therefore that there would be no need

> to steal what could be so easily legitimately

> purchased - not that the little value meant that

> it was OK to steal them. Theft is wrong, theft of

> something of no value is wrong and pointless. But

> maybe other posters are reading it right.


Well, I read it the same way as you.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theft is wrong, theft of

> something of no value is wrong and pointless.


I agree, and it is very sad that these people are teaching their children to steal too.

Whether they are North Cross Road daffodils or Goose Green daffodils is hardly the point.

I was on holiday last year and there was a lovely solitary rose growing in the hedge by which my caravan was situated. I watched people admire the flower, smell it and walk on for three or four days. Then some selfish shit came along, cut it off and took it away! Something that had given lots of people a couple of minutes pleasure ended up in a mug of water on someone elses table before dying. Some people don't want to share, they want to have.
Just echoing some sentiments mentioned earlier, is all. We re-located from Hants in '92 and when we arrived Lordship Lane was a welcoming reflection of my native Totton High St. Plenty of established family-run businesses and cosy pubs with character. Selfish was the wrong way to describe the change in atmosphere that came as a result of all the gentrification. Self-absorbed is probably a lot fairer.

Spot on jelly. Self-absorbed. Trendy claphamites snobbishly shunning the existing culture of a working-class neighbourhood and turning it into something which reflects their lifestyle. ED has not been allowed to integrate this changing culture, it has been forced to accept it as a new version of it's former self. People not caring about pricing out old family businesses, as long as they get their organic produce shop. When was the last time you saw one of these people frequenting a successful old school business like Farmer's or le moulin et al? And the whole "it's ok to pick daffodils because they are cheap" reflects badly upon society. My mother, a staunchly working class Peckham girl would have NEVER picked a flower from a park, she would e horrified, and we grew up with nothing to our names, but we wouldn't steal. You just don't do it. And to see fairly well off people thinking it's ok to do so is so deeply saddening.


Louisa.

And the whole "it's ok to pick daffodils because they are cheap" reflects badly upon society.


I don't believe anyone has said that - one person said something which was interpreted as being that by someone, but others did not read it that way at all.


And, once again, nobody is owed a living just because they are long established and local. If you can't raise sufficient revenues from your old customers to continue in business you have three choices - change your offer to meeet the needs of the new customers, stop trading or move to somewhere where the demographic you want to serve is still a viable customer base.


I know its tough for the residual (no longer commercially sustainable) customer base to see 'their' shops or eateries closing - their choice is to spend more there themselves to keep them profitable, or to accept that change happens.


Getting grumpy or chippy about incomers is simply a rather sad case of sour grapes.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spot on jelly. Self-absorbed. Trendy claphamites

> snobbishly shunning the existing culture of a

> working-class neighbourhood ........



I know this might offend some people but I don't ever remember ED being an entirely 'working class' neighbourhood. Perhaps there's been a change in the definition of working class but a review of census info and trade directories shows there have been plenty of middle class people (identified by professional occupations) living around here for more than a century.

And am I the only one to notice that many of the newer residents are very definitely blue collar workers? (A group of building labourers got off the bus ahead of me yesterday - they definitely weren't born here)

Yes, there are plenty of noisy, splash the cash types, who get on my wick at times, but I'm pretty certain that they like their daffs all wrapped up in fancy paper (who else would buy on Northcross road)- they're not so keen on getting their hands dirty in a public park.

20 years ago the Population of ED was very old. 49% owned cars and a large number (35%) of homes still had outside toilets. Most of that elderly population has died and the houses renovated and occupied by new 'incomers' . Soon - if not already these newcomer's children will be looking for jobs and probably leaving East Dulwich as property prices are too high. So maybe in 10 years time all the trendy bars will go as the population gets older again. Wonder what the definition of poverty will be - lack of a Jacuzzi maybe? . Just a thought. Who can really tell but E Dulwich is a constantly changing community half the houses would be empty and dilapidated if it weren't for the 'newcomers'
I was merely remarking how pointless the theft of the daffs was given their low monetary value. Am surprised some read it the other way. No matter who steals the daffs, ruining a perfectly good community display is remarkably selfish. It shows what value some have placed on others' hard work.

iceicebaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was merely remarking how pointless the theft of

> the daffs was given their low monetary value. Am

> surprised some read it the other way. No matter

> who steals the daffs, ruining a perfectly good

> community display is remarkably selfish. It shows

> what value some have placed on others' hard work.


Apologies iceicebaby... I read your post in haste and took the wrong message from it.

  • 7 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Re Day One, £52 for a short hair cut (cut & styling) and £72 for a long hair cut (cut & styling) which I believe is below the ears.  £38 for a blow dry which doesn’t appear to be included in the cut price as it’s not mentioned.  £15 for a fringe tidy.      I remember being startled to be charged separately for a blow dry by the salon that used to be in Melbourne Grove but is now closed down.  I was asked if I wanted a blow dry after the cut and highlights and said yes, but wasn’t told that I would be charged separately.  Only found out when I went to pay the bill.    Was offered a voucher on a further appointment.    De.Salon which used to be Cut-Throat in Peckham (Choumert Rd and Brixton) charge from £45 for a Short haircut that finishes by the ears.  They charge from £40 for any haircut that finishes below the jawline.  Their prices include a blow dry.  But if you have thick hair they charge an extra £15 for every additional 15 minutes for cutting.     I had my hair cut there before the name change.  I don’t understand the from part of the price. Had a look at the Blue Tit pricing which is very complicated. They charge depending on the stylist’s  experience.  Crab Salad in Peckham  -  short hair cut above the ear - from £69.    Long hair Cut below the ear from £80. Blow dry not mentioned as being included in the cut but is priced at £55 I noticed that Kuki charge different prices for men and women.  Doesn’t seem right if a woman has short hair and a man has long hair.   I used to go to a great salon in NW London  that charged the same price for men and women and stopped going when they upped their prices for women.  
    • BIAB is supposed to be less damaging to the nails than Shellac. It stands for Builder in a Bottle. 
    • I have been training at the hub for just over one year. I really enjoy the variety of training offered and the quality of the instructors. Very effective group classes and enjoyable in the open air! A very welcoming place which makes a fitmess journey pleasant!  
    • We're are just about to get ready for sale, a 2 bed flat, very close to Peckham Rye park.  It has been rented out for sometime, so is in need of some TLC for it to look its best, before it goes on the market.  Would be interested to know others thoughts on whether its best to just have the place painted completely white throughout, probably with new grey flooring, or if it might be more appealing to add some colour/interest (nothing too drastic), perhaps something alittle 'warmer', with some nice (potentially dark) feature walls maybe? Wondered whether the days of going completely white might now have passed ..... It might be useful to know that its not a period or conversion property, but rather a flat in a private purpose built block. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...