Jump to content

Recommended Posts

where are they ?


I had a couple of those annoying things crawling under my table in the plough, it's the second time it happened in just a few days.

enough! they just stare and wait for me to smile at them.

I don't, I'm not one of them, I've never been.

I don't smile at children. There is no logical reason to do so.


why can't I find a pub without children ?

if dogs have to stay out, why won't children too?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2268-children-free-zone/
Share on other sites

Have to agree with Azul, went for a quiet drink in the Plough recently, only to walk into a creche! As a mother myself , its not the presence of children I object to; rather the fact they are allowed to run unsupervised , making as much noise as they like! It is inconsiderate towards others and rather bad mannered, I always took stuff to amuse and distract mine so they did not disturb others. All common courtesy really!

We like you, Azul.

And totally agree with 2degrees (great nick!) it's not all children, just those whose parents let them think that everywhere they go they can scream and shout and that someone else will take care of them!

To be fair the Clockhouse is mostly childfree most days.

2D said:


Have to agree with Azul, went for a quiet drink in the Plough recently, only to walk into a creche! As a mother myself , its not the presence of children I object to; rather the fact they are allowed to run unsupervised , making as much noise as they like! It is inconsiderate towards others and rather bad mannered, I always took stuff to amuse and distract mine so they did not disturb others. All common courtesy really!


If you popped into the Plough on a Friday afternoon, that's when they run their increasingly popular mum and baby group. Dont think it's that bad at other times.

mightyroar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nero is right this whole thread is so last year.

>

> But if logic is your raison d'etre then why go to

> the pub at all? paying more than the off licence

> price for a can of special brew and drinking it in

> your own home would surely be more logical



Er, going to the pub and not wanting kids around doesn't automatically make you a special brew drinking alcoholic :-S

Lol, am fully aware that there is a Dad's and Toddlers sess friday afternoons and therefore choose to go elsewhere if I'm lucky enough to get the chance to drink on a Friday afternoon! Was a weekend when I visited!

Had stopped using the clockhouse cos it became too creche -like at the weekends, perhaps it's time to become a regular again, ta muchly for the info!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mightyroar Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > nero is right this whole thread is so last

> year.

> >

> > But if logic is your raison d'etre then why go

> to

> > the pub at all? paying more than the off

> licence

> > price for a can of special brew and drinking it

> in

> > your own home would surely be more logical

>

>

> Er, going to the pub and not wanting kids around

> doesn't automatically make you a special brew

> drinking alcoholic :-S


Where in that post did I call Azul an alcaholic?

took me years of nasty hangovers, watch my growing belly, and gain my status.

I'm one, and proud of it.

and I hope this year, I can became a smoker again.



never been a child, though.

I've always been this size and been this old.


I think I'm now declaring the CPT as my local,

but someone mentioned clockhouse.

what and where is that ?

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Suspect the Silver Buckle would be child-free -

> perhaps Alan a Dale could confirm?


I have never seen any kids in there but I did once see a heavily pregnant woman drinking in there. She even sang Phil Collins' Easy Lover on Karaoke- true story.


She's not been back in since the smoking ban though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This link.provides the full.articke using an archive site  https://archive.is/J8DvF The summary is that the taxes on electricity could be removed but an equivalent levy would then be added to gas to encourage people tonusevheat pumps.  Not convinced it would stay like that but it isn't quite as sensational as the headlines 
    • Looking for a small corner sofa  🙂
    • Just had Hussein and his team redecorate our flat. Did a very good and efficient job and is a nice person to boot!
    • No, you didn’t write the article. But unless you’re a Telegraph subscriber, you haven’t read the article either. Have you read it? The psychopath Telegraph lives behind a (rubber) paywall but using this kind of sensationalist, accusatory headline gets it traction on social media. The headline becomes more important than the article; many will see it and some will take it as a statement of fact. And it will be shown on endless “let’s take a look at the papers” segments on TV and radio for 12 hours or more in every news day. And so, a tiny number of reactionary, right wing hacks has a vastly disproportionate influence on the popular conversation despite the papers they work for being bought by almost nobody these days. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...