Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Given the often lengthy delays, I try to limit the visits to the PO to one or two a week. Yesterday afternoon, 90 minutes before closing, there were 22 people in the queue with 3 windows open and rather than opening another window to accommodate the growing numbers, one went off for his break. The line quickly lengthened to 28 including one woman with a plastered leg on crutches, 3 lots of mums with (understandably) screaming young children in pushchairs on such a warm afternoon. 1/2 hour later, even more customers had spilled out on to the street and still no extra staff. The manager was no where to be seen and despite several customers asking for extra staff, noone came out. It is a given that staff have breaks, but surely, not at peak times which seems like very poor customer service and mismanagement. The frustrated staff asked to put complaints in writing (however this hasn't worked at all in the past). My waiting time was 40 minutes. With the sub post offices all but gone, and the Village perhaps the only other option, surely there has to be an effective way to get the post office to respond to the obvious demand.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22768-ll-post-office/
Share on other sites

Hi Stacey-lyn, I too was stood in this queue yesterday for about 40mins, dreadful! Only half the windows were being served. The queue was right out the door along LL. It's been like this for some time now, not sure why so busy. We are 2 sub post offies down that I am aware of, one from E.D Rd & one from Crystal Palace Rd but they've been gone some years & there's still one by the library. Opening all the windows would obviously help though.
Thank you Callie, Bic Basher, candp and those who PM'd for your alternatives - I shall try them out. Btw, when I spoke to the manager a few months ago, he said that 3 of the senior & most experienced staff had left (all of whom I knew as I've been in ED for years): 1 forced into early retirement, another transferred to Brixton and the other promoted to another branch, which has only exacerbated the staffing problems. He offered no solutions. In any event, so rather than a nice short walk to my local LL PO with my parcels & post, before or after a stroll to the LL shops, bank etc. all in one local trip, it looks like it's the inconvenience of a commute. Not really good enough, is it, but I'd rather that than more of these frustrating unacceptable fiascos. Life's too short. ;-)
Giacomelli - which one in Peckham are you referring to? Both Rye Lane and Peckham High St are always busy - although admittedly well-staffed. I agree with Indiepanda, (there is always a queue in there but) the staff are so lovely and you can browse your paper/mag while you wait.

What does everyone expect- LL PO is very busy with the middle classes sending all kinds of tat over the world to their middle class pals, and it is they who clog up the PO.

Moaning about the queues etc is just another nail in the coffin for LL branch, and then another thread can be started to complain the PO has gone.

Common sense would dictate that unless absolutely necessary do not use the PO at any lunchtimes/Monday mornings/Friday afternoons/Saturdays and then you will probably find the wait not too onerous for your busy schedule.

I would much rather a PO where it is now than elsewhere.

Oh dear. Not that sort of tosh again.


Just a couple of snippets from the Post Office website:


"Serving you for centuries, the Post Office? is committed to making your life easier so that you can concentrate on what really matters." "We are a commercially driven organisation that fulfils an essential social role."



What Worker said.

If it's anything like New Cross PO, half the problem is that each transaction takes twice as long as it should. Once you've finished what it is you went into the PO for, they then try to flog you top up for your mobile phone, their savings products, credit cards... All this when there's a queue of 20 people behind you waiting to be served. I feel sorry for the cashiers though, I imagine management make them go through this.

I usually use the sub PO on Forest Hill Rd which is great. Went to LL main office on Monday and they were busy, but really friendly and doing their best. The young guy that served me gave me stickers for the kids which I thought was a nice touch.


Having stood in the queue watching for a while I was amazed at how rude the majority of people being served were. Must be a soul destroying job to sit behind glass all day dealing with people who don't even take the time to say thank you or smile.

Lu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it's anything like New Cross PO, half the

> problem is that each transaction takes twice as

> long as it should. Once you've finished what it

> is you went into the PO for, they then try to flog

> you top up for your mobile phone, their savings

> products, credit cards... All this when there's a

> queue of 20 people behind you waiting to be

> served. I feel sorry for the cashiers though, I

> imagine management make them go through this.


xxxxxxxx


Really?


I use the LL post office fairly frequently, and I've never once had anybody try to sell me anything - apart from what I went there for, obviously :)

I think it should be a given that customers who need to fill out forms should stand aside to do it. I use the PO a lot and I arrive with my envelopes ready to be scanned. I literally only take seconds at the counter. If you need to fill out a form, borrow a pen, finish selotaping your package, or anything else that does not require staff input, then stand aside and let someone else be served. It's soul destroying to watch staff staring into space whilst waiting for customers to get ready to be served.


Don't get me started on people who are on their phones at the counter; that's rude to the staff serving them and to the people waiting.


The staff at Lordship Lane are good people doing their best. It's not their place to say "oh it's busy today I won't take a break". That's the thin end of the wedge. They have to eat and they have errands to run, just like everyone else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...