Jump to content

Recommended Posts

meat burgers i dont care about. but what annoys me is if i go there with friends who do, the option for me is shite.

In new york for example there are non meat burgers that are so awesome you cant believe it. They are a different breed to anything you see here (i should import them!). so, be great to think some joint with a name like 'gourmet burger kitchen' could be up with the times and include something like what im suggesting.A few mushrooms pinned together in a bread roll with chutney or whatever sucks.

I'm hearin' ya Woodie. I'm a veggie and have to hold back the tears of anger when I go there to eat with Mr. MW74 who tucks gleefully into his meat attack on a plate burger.


I guess, I must go to NYC to get a decent burger. I'll put it to Mr. MW74 later....seeif he's up for paying!

sean, there is a thread about the place here GOURMET BURGERS. Have a scan and you'll see who is not impressed. I've always enjoyed myself when I've been there. Some people on here are exraordinarily fussy when it comes to eating out. perhaps the company they keep is so uninspiring that they have to concentrate on the food ;-)

seanmlow, ?20 for two burgers and a plate of chips and two drinks... My god what is this world coming to? You could buy some decent burgers and potatoes and make that at home for less than a fiver.. I dont understand the fascination with what is basically just fast food at expensive prices. Go to Mcdonalds or Burger King if you want take-away style cheap food, dont go to a place thats pretentious and tries to make what is a simple inexpensive and relatively unhealthy food option sound like a dinner!


Louisa.

I must say that I have had a burger in just about every place in ED that offers them. GBK, Liquorice, The Bishop et al. But for pure enjoyment none of them have come close a Whopper with Cheese on an empty stomach.


I still wouldn?t want a bloody Burger King in ED though. I know where they are when I want them.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> seanmlow, ?20 for two burgers and a plate of chips

> and two drinks... My god what is this world coming

> to? You could buy some decent burgers and potatoes

> and make that at home for less than a fiver.. I

> dont understand the fascination with what is

> basically just fast food at expensive prices. Go

> to Mcdonalds or Burger King if you want take-away

> style cheap food, dont go to a place thats

> pretentious and tries to make what is a simple

> inexpensive and relatively unhealthy food option

> sound like a dinner!

>

> Louisa.




or you could go to iceland and get a box of economy burgers,an eclectic choice of various types of oven or fried chips,burger baps,ketchup/relish and have change out of a fiver.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...