Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Policy 5.6 Car parking

432 All developments requiring car parking should minimise the number of spaces provided. Maximum standards are set out in Appendix 15.

433 Where more than 20 surface parking spaces are proposed, applicants must demonstrate why this cannot be provided underground or within the building.

434 All developments will be expected to include justification for the amount of car parking sought, taking into account:

i. Public Transport Accessibility Levels set out in Appendix 15; and

ii. The impact on overspill parking; and

iii. The demand for parking within the Controlled Parking Zones. The LPA will restrict permit

provision where necessary.

435 Parking for retail and leisure uses within town centres should be shared with public parking, not reserved for customers of a particular development. Maximum stay restrictions are required for all retail and leisure town centre parking.

Reasons

436 Too many cars cause problems with congestion and pollution, increasing travel times and expense as well as causing health problems. With fewer car parking spaces available people will seek alternative modes of transport to the private car, subsequently reducing congestion and pollution.

437 Access to services, leisure, shops and a range of amenities by public transport and other alternative modes of transport to the private car must be considered when providing less car parking in order to ensure efficiency and social inclusion. Measures to control overspill parking are necessary in order to prevent or mitigate loss of amenity including inconvenience to local residents caused by overspill car parking and increased pressure on on-street spaces.

438 Appendix 16 contains a schedule of existing Controlled Parking Zones.

439 PPS3, PPG 4, PPG 5 and PPG 13 recommend the restriction of private car use to either housing or employment sites and improved accessibility through the encouragement of modes of transport other than the private car.

Thanks, mynamehere!


first mate, despite what happens with the M&S, I think we still need to look at the bigger picture in the Dulwich area, as I believe that the piecemeal approach is only exacerbating problems.


Again, this is a long discussion, probably best for another thread, but I personally feel that a multilevel approach is what is needed.


On one hand, as a non-driver, I am well aware of the problems involved in navigating around the Dulwich area without a car. It can take me up to 45 minutes to travel across my ward, which takes around 5 minutes by car. I have to leave up to an hour between meetings (which drives people mad and inevitably reduces the number of meetings I can have in one day) and it can take up to an hour and a half for me to get to the council offices in Tooley St - a journey that can take between 20 and 30 minutes by car - or up to three hours round trip, detracting from the time I can spend on casework.


Our policies clearly state that, with fewer car parking spaces available, people will seek alternative modes of transport to the private car... but, in Dulwich this is difficult because public transport options are limited (we have been lobbying TfL for the past five years to get the 42 bus extended so that we have an east-west alternative to the 37, to no avail, and I have even looked into the possibility of launching our own local bus service) and the high demographic of mothers with small children and elderly people limits how many residents can cycle easily/safely.


Our policies recognise these local restrictions and allow for more car parking spaces than in the rest of the borough and I think there are still more creative options that can be explored - both in general and in this specific application.


It's a matter of public record that I voted against the latest CPZ in the consultation, clearly stating that officers should try to find more possible parking spaces to mitigate the displacement of cars around the station - and I personally still think there is more that we can do on this.


So, the short answer to your question, first mate, is that I think the community needs to work together to find a balance between positive growth on our high street and loss of amenity to the local residents. You would be amazed at how much power a community has when it speaks with one voice.

-Heinz- Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cars today are many times more efficient and clean

> than a decade or so a go. Progress in that field

> is constant and I am

>

> not sure residents of ED are in any danger of

> suffering from car induced pollution illnesses...

>

>

> On the other hand, lefty world saving do gooders

> driving 1960' VW Campervans are as green as a frog

> in a blender...So

>

> maybe we should vote to force them to offset their

> carbon footprint by digging us "normals" a shiny

> new underground car

>

> park under Goose Green. I recon the ratio of earth

> dug up, to tonnes of Aquarious free thinking

> Campervan induced carbon

>

> is about 1... So you know it makes sense.



Hmm...first off, all diesels are bad in town because of the minute particulates. Secondly, running an older car is arguably greener than driving a modern one, because of the effect the manufacturing has on the environment.


Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we're not all driving round in Austin Princesses; but equally you'll find the average age of a car in ED is probably between 8-12 years or so.

I would be gutted to see Iceland go - and frankly, would be forced to use my car to drive more often to the nearest LIDL and Aldi. It saves me huge amounts on my family food bills in comparison to other local supermarkets. Whilst I LOVE M&S food, it is but a mere aspiration for me and mine to actually be able to afford it.


Or I could stop eating, I suppose.

Moreover, given all the recent media stories of escalating food prices to come this autumn/winter, Iceland will be the only place I can remotely afford (and even that at a push). Grumble, grumble, etc. And, for someone who is, frankly, pretty rubbish at mental arithmetic these days, it really helps me a lot that many of their prices are in ?s and .50s.... ;)

Iceland deliver if you sincerely can't get to the one in Peckham


fuzzyboots Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moreover, given all the recent media stories of

> escalating food prices to come this autumn/winter,

> Iceland will be the only place I can remotely

> afford (and even that at a push). Grumble,

> grumble, etc. And, for someone who is, frankly,

> pretty rubbish at mental arithmetic these days, it

> really helps me a lot that many of their prices

> are in ?s and .50s.... ;)

Does that not mean I have to go to New Cross though?! Or have I (quite probably!) misunderstood how their delivery system operates? Peckham is actually quite tricky because I run on such a tight timetable in order not to have to drag the kids shopping with me (for my sanity and purse's sake...) and I can't honestly envisage me walking their with my glamorous shopping trolley (and back). Or lumbering around on a bus with my goodies!
Hmmm - have just investigated and I am correct. You have to go to the store and make your purchases and then book a delivery. Rather defeats most of the object for me, since quite frankly, I'm not up for travelling to NX to leave my shopping behind...! (http://www.iceland.co.uk/home-delivery/frequently-asked-questions)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...