Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Phew this getting like Chines Whispers! FACTS!

Council officials have told me that they met with the developers, raised a numbers of serious issues (which I believe were identified by residents and ward cllrs) and are awaiting the developer to resubmit their plans taking into account these issues.

On this basis it probably wont go to committee until Nov/Dec at the earliest.

Reply to Louisa.


Well and truly satisfied, don?t need more parking and traffic in ED, it was a lovely quite suburban area, Until it started to get overcrowded, and Houses and flats allowed to take the place of pubs and businesses, with no where to park their cars.


VERY PLEASED NOW.

East Dulwich is not a Town "YET"


Will keep on objecting to things that affect, Residents and my way of Life.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hope everyone is now satisfied with this

> ridiculous outcome. We had the opportunity to

> attract a major high street name into the area, in

> a time of recession when many town centres up and

> down the country suffering badly with empty

> premises. Be careful what you wish for cos' you

> just might get, and guess what you have, nothing!

> So typical of people in ED objecting to anything

> and everything - and this is the result. Very

> angry right now.

>

> Louisa


Agree Louisa.... I hope we don't see a run down unused high street where locals have to travel to areas that have the retail outlets they need. Short term vision sometimes leads to long term degeneration of an area. A great area that could be run down as retailers are scared away... Shame.

Serena2012 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A Waitrose is just what Lordship Lane needs. I am

> still disappointed that the M&S Planning

> application was unsuccessful but would be

> delighted if the eyesore that is Iceland was

> replaced with Waitrose.


The 'eyesore' that is Iceland is mostly a glass shopfront. The real eyesore is what is above the shop. That is really ugly. How would that change if Waitrose or anyone else occupied the shop space?

Even if M&S/Waitrose come to nothing. The threat has caused the Co-op to upgrade their show, I now use it regularly and am impressed.


If Iceland do stay, I hope that they invest in the place, it could do with a tart-up.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Minkey wrote

>

> Iceland is fine! Long may it stay and long may the

> great staff in there have jobs."

>

> Totally agree

>

> I second that!!


Sadly they're off in January according to the notice...

To Serena2012,



SNOB, SNOB, SNOB! Are you serious?

There are hundreds, maybe thousands of local people who need Iceland to manage their household budgets and many excellent staff there that need to keep their jobs.

Perhaps you don't have a neighbours, like I do, who shop there.


Cheers anyway.

Just because someone wants an M&S store in place of Iceland doesn't make them a snob. Please stop making this a class issue. I would prefer M&S and I don't regard myself as a snob - I'm no Andrew Mitchell, far from it.


Iceland isn't some idealistic workers' co-operative - it's just as highly capitalist an organisation as M&S.

How true. A sad tendency to knee jerk a class based comment based on wanting to see one capitalist retailer rather than another capitalist retailer.


The Co-op will still be there. Sadly they do not sell frozen Greggs sausage rolls, which will be a great loss.


Just been in to Iceland (2 packets of pancakes and onion and garlic dip), the notice on the door just thanks people for their support and says that they have no news re the M&S takeover. No date for closure mentioned.

Yes the Co-op will still be there, but I find it to be on par with corner shop prices unless something's on a special deal. It's just too expensive if you're having to watch the pennies. Iceland is just about the last grocery store on LL catering for people on limited incomes. For that alone, it gets my vote.

Those that profess support for Iceland and cite the demand for its services and good from the poor and unsnobby elementsof Ed should take up their case with Iceland's Board. The Iceland Corporate Responsibility page on their website (http://www.iceland.co.uk/about-iceland/corporate-responsibility/ )states they support over 750 communities.


However, it seems they have decided the ED demographic trend is running against their offering. Their decision is undoubtedly based on a realistic commercial appraisal. Similarly M&S, if they do open a store on Lordship Lane will base their decision on a realistic commercial appraisal and understanding of the demographic trends of ED.

Wow. Capital letters and all.


I'm reading that Serena 2012 likes Waitrose, would have liked M&S, and doesn't like the aesthetics of the Iceland store (orange is a bit of a marmite colour after all).


And you're reading that she is a snob (thrice over), doesn't care about her neighbours that shop at Iceland, or about the people that work there (either that or she has a mysterious preference for employment oppurtunities created by Waitrose or M&S).


Am I missing something?


i*Rate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To Serena2012,

>

>

> SNOB, SNOB, SNOB! Are you serious?

> There are hundreds, maybe thousands of local

> people who need Iceland to manage their household

> budgets and many excellent staff there that need

> to keep their jobs.

> Perhaps you don't have a neighbours, like I do,

> who shop there.

>

> Cheers anyway.

You East Dulwich people do make me laugh. What happened to community spirit and support. Some local residents need shops like Iceland and others want waitrose. surely in times like these there is room for all levels of shopping requirements. You never know how long you can afford to shop in high end stores so do not knock the lower end as it might bite you in the butt......... :)

For the people who live close to icelands, its not who has the

shop or who takes it over, its the development of doing away

With a car park, and having some where for the tenants of the

new flats to park their cars, and deliveries.The councils

policy on flats and houses being built with nowhere to park

their cars, because they are supposed to notneed cars,

because we have such a good transport system in place, will

never work and is just causing more problems for local

residents, and is such rubbish, they need their heads

examining.

lets get some joined up thinking here...


challenges:

- some people want iceland to stay

- some people want an m&s / waitrose?

- most people want a police station locally

- the police though are selling their property on crystal palace road?http://search.knightfrank.com/rss120286

- the police are also planning to leave their premises on lordship lane


opportunity:

- retain iceland as is

- police downsize to crystal palace road

- police station on lordship lane is demolished to make space for new M&S / Waitrose

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...