Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> England tonight - a reminder that Scotland beat

> France twice (home and away) in the Euro 2008

> qualifiers. If we can do it against the odds

> you'll find it a walk over right?


That's the sprit MrBen, England will have no problem replicating Scotland's performances...cue 80F heat and running around aimlessly with very red faces

France showed more promise, but wre slighly off form I think.

Lucky for INGERLAND to draw them early on


I think Ukraine vs INGERLAND will be a stonker


Sweden will draw with INGERLAND btw


Scotland beat the France twice, but I had to admit that the Scots were on the defence for most of the game

I can't believe an England tournament game has garnered such little response, and even that from a foreigner ;)


England were better than I expected them to be. No standouts but a good team performance, though clearly we were set up to stymie the French we created chances and had some incisive breaks.


It's hard to tell with the French, they seemed a little disorganised, but whether they will improve or implode is anyone's guess.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Irish were pretty poor and I can't see them

> progressing. I suspect Italy and Spain will aim to

> improve their goal difference when playing against

> them though.


Ireland Spain is a disaster waiting to happen. Early goal from Spain and they might as well go home. I'm sure Ireland would love to hold out for a Nil Nil. If they lose to Spain, then I do feel for the fans who spent money to go for such a disappointing display. But it was a tough draw from the start and its always a tough tournament to get out of the group, as England know themselves.

The most important thing is not to lose the first game and England didn't. Basically, we parked the bus and hoped to get them on the break. On paper that was our toughest game in the group but I also think we'll draw against the Swedes and playing the Ukraine on their home turf after such a good win last night won't be easy.

Keep seeing comments along the lines of "why are they happy with a draw"? To be fair to England, France only managed a draw with them, Spain and Italy drew. Holland lost!!! One win and two draws would probably see them through, so not sure what the problem is.


I think they did quite well, especially given that France are unbeaten in 21 or something like that. Had Milner scored that early chance, it could have been a win... Or they could have gotten over confident and lost it.

England were as expected, dull and unadventurous, but played the way they had to. If they had opened up - like they did against Germany - they would have got beaten. I am hoping to see slow improvement each game and at least Roy has got us organised. How many times have you watched England before and not really known what the team and the players were trying to do? The hope is Rooney adds the strardust and links well with Young and Welbeck.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its occured to me that he might not just walk back

> into the 1st 11 teamsheet if the others do the

> business.


It has also occurred to me that I may have spotted another Alan Medic spelling error.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Motty reckons Young will move to the left and

> Rooney will play behind Welbeck...


Makes sense. Young will give England more width. I'd like to see Andy Carroll replace Welbeck due to the number of headed goals in the tournament.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> England band stopped from playing.

>

> Thank God for that! If I was sat near them trying

> to watch the match, I'd want to kill myself!


Abso-bleedin-lutely. Let's hope others follow suit and ban the annoying little sods totally.


On the match I thought the Ox did well and showed he didn't mind fluffing it a little, wasn't scared to take a chance - hope this rubs off on neurotics like Gerrard et al and we see a less fearful England in future. He and Young have to stay in the team or they will probably revert to the long ball.

I thought the Ox played well considering his lack of England experience and first major tournament game. He showed glimpses of brilliance at times.


My main criticism of England is that they didn't stretch the French defence enough to allow the likes of Ox to go through with consummate ease.


Lots of positives. The French restricted to shooting from outside the box. England had enough clear cut chances to win the game. Milner should have put his chance away. Four points should be enough to go through to the knock out stages and it's likely England will beat Ukraine and Sweden.


To see the best of the Ox then I'd like to see Walcott play as well. The injection of pace will put fear to the opposition.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's hard to tell with the French, they seemed a

> little disorganised, but whether they will improve

> or implode is anyone's guess.


France had the greater possession so I'm not quite sure why you thought they were a little disorganised. Perhaps you're confusing disorganisation with their lack of ideas in the final third. Defensively, France looked weak but I thought they looked organised overall.

Maybe I'm confusing organisation with liquidity.


** or less flippantly


I think you're confusing possession for organisation.

Ceding possession and hitting them on the break in expectation of facing a more clinical side was clearly part of the gameplan.

France's lack of ideas in the final third isn't to be confused with a lack of oraganisation, it's utterly symptomatic of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I suppose all these issues that need addressing are a reflection of the times we live in. Important and necessary but somehow destroy the underlying spirit.
    • Do you know who organised and ran it? Because it must have been quite a lot of work. Who kept track of the credits? What safeguards were they? Was there a lower age limit eg over 18? Was insurance needed? ID? Who checked it? What was the situation if somebody was injured while working in your house or garden? What if someone broke or stole something? What if someone in your house was molested or attacked? What if you weren't happy with the standard of work? Sorry to be gloomy, but whilst this sounds a great idea in theory, in common with many people I know I've had several  bad experiences with supposedly professional tradespeople, let alone someone who wasn't doing it for a living.
    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...