Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> England tonight - a reminder that Scotland beat

> France twice (home and away) in the Euro 2008

> qualifiers. If we can do it against the odds

> you'll find it a walk over right?


That's the sprit MrBen, England will have no problem replicating Scotland's performances...cue 80F heat and running around aimlessly with very red faces

France showed more promise, but wre slighly off form I think.

Lucky for INGERLAND to draw them early on


I think Ukraine vs INGERLAND will be a stonker


Sweden will draw with INGERLAND btw


Scotland beat the France twice, but I had to admit that the Scots were on the defence for most of the game

I can't believe an England tournament game has garnered such little response, and even that from a foreigner ;)


England were better than I expected them to be. No standouts but a good team performance, though clearly we were set up to stymie the French we created chances and had some incisive breaks.


It's hard to tell with the French, they seemed a little disorganised, but whether they will improve or implode is anyone's guess.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Irish were pretty poor and I can't see them

> progressing. I suspect Italy and Spain will aim to

> improve their goal difference when playing against

> them though.


Ireland Spain is a disaster waiting to happen. Early goal from Spain and they might as well go home. I'm sure Ireland would love to hold out for a Nil Nil. If they lose to Spain, then I do feel for the fans who spent money to go for such a disappointing display. But it was a tough draw from the start and its always a tough tournament to get out of the group, as England know themselves.

The most important thing is not to lose the first game and England didn't. Basically, we parked the bus and hoped to get them on the break. On paper that was our toughest game in the group but I also think we'll draw against the Swedes and playing the Ukraine on their home turf after such a good win last night won't be easy.

Keep seeing comments along the lines of "why are they happy with a draw"? To be fair to England, France only managed a draw with them, Spain and Italy drew. Holland lost!!! One win and two draws would probably see them through, so not sure what the problem is.


I think they did quite well, especially given that France are unbeaten in 21 or something like that. Had Milner scored that early chance, it could have been a win... Or they could have gotten over confident and lost it.

England were as expected, dull and unadventurous, but played the way they had to. If they had opened up - like they did against Germany - they would have got beaten. I am hoping to see slow improvement each game and at least Roy has got us organised. How many times have you watched England before and not really known what the team and the players were trying to do? The hope is Rooney adds the strardust and links well with Young and Welbeck.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its occured to me that he might not just walk back

> into the 1st 11 teamsheet if the others do the

> business.


It has also occurred to me that I may have spotted another Alan Medic spelling error.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Motty reckons Young will move to the left and

> Rooney will play behind Welbeck...


Makes sense. Young will give England more width. I'd like to see Andy Carroll replace Welbeck due to the number of headed goals in the tournament.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> England band stopped from playing.

>

> Thank God for that! If I was sat near them trying

> to watch the match, I'd want to kill myself!


Abso-bleedin-lutely. Let's hope others follow suit and ban the annoying little sods totally.


On the match I thought the Ox did well and showed he didn't mind fluffing it a little, wasn't scared to take a chance - hope this rubs off on neurotics like Gerrard et al and we see a less fearful England in future. He and Young have to stay in the team or they will probably revert to the long ball.

I thought the Ox played well considering his lack of England experience and first major tournament game. He showed glimpses of brilliance at times.


My main criticism of England is that they didn't stretch the French defence enough to allow the likes of Ox to go through with consummate ease.


Lots of positives. The French restricted to shooting from outside the box. England had enough clear cut chances to win the game. Milner should have put his chance away. Four points should be enough to go through to the knock out stages and it's likely England will beat Ukraine and Sweden.


To see the best of the Ox then I'd like to see Walcott play as well. The injection of pace will put fear to the opposition.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's hard to tell with the French, they seemed a

> little disorganised, but whether they will improve

> or implode is anyone's guess.


France had the greater possession so I'm not quite sure why you thought they were a little disorganised. Perhaps you're confusing disorganisation with their lack of ideas in the final third. Defensively, France looked weak but I thought they looked organised overall.

Maybe I'm confusing organisation with liquidity.


** or less flippantly


I think you're confusing possession for organisation.

Ceding possession and hitting them on the break in expectation of facing a more clinical side was clearly part of the gameplan.

France's lack of ideas in the final third isn't to be confused with a lack of oraganisation, it's utterly symptomatic of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There's probably a bigger discussion on why we celebrate Christmas (pagan/religious festival) and why everything has to shut down.  I've enjoyed Xmas days in Spain, Mexico and France where some businesses and restaurants are open, and in a number of non-Christrian countries.  In both sets of occasions it has been festive, but not over the top and the Spanish seem to have a more relaxed attitude in a country where the church is probably more important than the UK.  A Lounge conversation.  I'll no doubt be popping into the Forest Hill Road supermarket on Xmas day for things we have forgotten, with many others in a similar situation who grew up in the Christian faith (I've long since been an atheist).   
    • Would anyone have ends of balls of wool, any colour, to mend an old blanket? Any colour? With thanks Mila
    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...