Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ignoring the fact that they are often rammed as well (and therefore a very different proposition to betting shops)


Not sure I totally agree with that point Sean. Firstly, I know a lot of people who regularly use betting shops, they just tend for the most part to be an older generation.


Secondly, most betting shops don't have transparent windows, so how do people know who is in there unless they are going in there?


Thirdly, I used to work in one, and believe me, you only need a few regulars to keep you going. These people bet big, and often loose big because they often don't know when to quit.

Keef


Betting shops are now allowed to have clear windows that you can see through and many of the new ones are providing this facility with limited advertising features in the windows. Seeing into a betting office is now a lot easier. The fact some punters don't know when to quit is a problem often impacting on their familes. Big losers cause big problems for those who have to live with them. The average gambler is probably sensible playing to a budget but there are many that don't as you will probably remember from your days in a betting office.

I agre on the drink and drugs. So far as drink is concerned blame central government. They allowed the free for all on liquor licensed premises and made the situation worse by bringing in 24 hour drinking. Hence we have so many problems in our town centres. Now they are allowing the same free for all with gambling and betting shops. Drugs - other than prescription and over the counter - are a bit different in that they are illegal per se, drinking and gambling are not. Are we going to see the same discounted type offers in betting shops as we regularly see in pubs, off licenses and supermarkets. I don't know but wouldn't mind betting we do.

What odds will you give me telboy?

You can see the effects of the new liquor law now. Binge drinking, rise in under age drinking, rise in alcohol related health problems. You can measure these through crime figures and a&e figures.

If I was a betting man I would wager that in two years time there will be a rise in betting related problems ie addiction, debt etc only these effects are harder to see and quantify.

Comes back to what I said before. Will we have all sorts of special offers to lure people in and part them from their money just like the liquor industry does. The more offices you get the more they have got to fight to retain market share. Don't know much about hypnotic roulette but I do know a lot of people lose a lot of money on the tables both real and virtual. LL was quite busy tonight but not in the bookies. No special offers advertised. Some of the bars were quitey though. Enough of them already.


have to agree on the reasoning here - all of these things were accelerating at pace long before new legislation - the legislation was partly hoped to curb the excesses. That it hasn't is not good news but it ain't the reason behind the culture

"How come everyone is talking about the evils of gambling and yet it's ok for brand new organic off licences and trendy bars to open up in abundance along the lane? Double standards or what!"


Firstly: no organic off-licenses opening on LL. One claims to be but isn't

Secondly: while both gambling and drinking to excess are BOTH evils, drinking and eating establishments at least offer the chance of convivial soc-ialising for all the family - eating and drinking with friends and family are what make us human. Gambling is just a vice


So - no double standards.

Sean


I totally agree. We have always had a culture of excess in this country. You can trace it back to the gin palaces of the 19th century and beyond. We will never be a cafe culture nation like the French or Italians. I concur that bars and restaurants are far more family friendly now and provide for convivial surroundings. The same cannot be said for betting shops which are mainly male dominated, though some women do use them. Children are banned. It's not that many years ago that gambling was run by illegal street bookmakers, I can certainly remember them. Funny how things evolve. The illegal street bookmakers then became the legitimate face of the industry when betting shops were first licenced. What a way to run a country. You can't control the crime so legalise it, give the criminals a licence and let them run it. 45 years on they are big business.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sean, you patently have never been to a

> point-to-point. Great family/friends day out with

> lucious picnics, booze and part of the fun having

> a flutter. No vice where I'm concerned.

>

> Ditto a day at the races is very convivial.


Although I agree with the sentiments expressed here - a betting shop is not a racetrack - no sunshine or picnics in there!

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> eating and drinking with friends and family are what make us human. Gambling is just a vice

> So - no double standards.


Massive generalisation, and total nonsense I'm afraid. Every betting shop will have it's regulars just like the pubs. Often these men (more often than not) will sit together in a cafe and sort their bets, they'll then go and put their bets on. They may then go to a pub to watch the races, and will then go back to collect their winnings.


I have met several betters in the past who have said to me "who's the mug, me or you. You go and spend ?20 in the pub and never see it again. I let myself spend ?20 on betting because I enjoy it, and have budgeted for it, and I have a chance of seeing my money back".


Some people just do it as a hobby, and it is a social thing for them.


It really isn't the seedy underbelly of society that everyone makes it out to be.

Keef


I agree with you that betting offices today are not the seedy underbelly of society anymore. The vast majority are now run by good legitimate businesses. The issue of a new betting ofice for LL was originally raised by Alba back in December with the question, "How can we stop it". Reading the postings there are mixed views and it would be interesting to see how strong the feeling is one way or the other. How about a quick simple poll. YES for I want it, NO for I don't want it or DC for don't care.


I don't have strong views either way.

Some people just do it as a hobby, and it is a social thing for them.


I'm not anti gambling per se, but I am biased against the proliferation of gambling opportunities (both on and off-line) simply because my childhood (and my siblings) was wrecked by a father with a serious gambling addiction.


Everytime I look inside a betting office it seems to be mostly full of the very people who can ill afford to gamble (bit like a Wetherspoons at 10.30 am). How many of those seriously see it as a hobby? How many of them are vulnerable to the false dream of getting rich quick? At casino's I see so many that are glued to a machine or a table night after night. Tell me that's not a problem. Now casino's are actively upgrading the restaurants and entertainment area to make them non gambler friendly. In other words to suck in more punters for the impulse gamble.


All of this is fine if the safeguards are there to protect the vulnerable and their families. I'm not convinced this is the case.


I should just state that I do occasionally gamble on the horses, at a casino, the dogs, poker and backgammon.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, in conclusion...gambling offends the

> sensibilities of the petit bourgeois



Gambling is a form of behaviour that is undertaken by all classes. Some of the aristocracy of the 18th century lost their fortunes through their gambling. It does not matter who gambles as long as it is under control. Loss of dignity/house/family/livelihood is a tragedy no matter to whom it happens.

I have seen the dangers of this industry, a fool and his money are easily parted irrespective of their social standing, and they all need the same protection.

You can have too much of a good thing. In 2 years time posts on this forum could be "my teenager is addicted to electronic roulette machines." Or "my partner has gambled away the equity in the house during the housing cash of 2k8" and we can say "oh what a shame, maybe we should have done something about the 5th betting office application."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...