Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been amused by many of my liberal friends going on about letting him rot in jail, throw away the key etc...and the blokes not even had a trial yet*


Creepy ozzie liberal= "Not Guilty"

Hacking tory= "Guilty"


like pavlov's mutts


* to be clear not ALL of my liberal friends and I 'suspect' he's guilty too but double standards or what shocker

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been amused by many of my liberal friends

> going on about letting him rot in jail, throw away

> the key etc...and the blokes not even had a trial

> yet*

>

> Creepy ozzie liberal= "Not Guilty"

> Hacking tory= "Guilty"

>

> like pavlov's mutts

>

> * to be clear not ALL of my liberal friends and I

> 'suspect' he's guilty too but double standards or

> what shocker


Thing is ???'s


Liberals or not 'people' want Coulson to be guilty, in as much as they want that guilt projected onto the present government


Because if Coulson is guilty


Then Cameron is is guilty


If Coulson is a c-nut


Then Cameron is a C-NUT


All the more, there's a 'need' to stick something to Cameron, specially after his handling (rightly/wrongly) of the whole Jezzer Hunt saga


Netts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. The BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie even now. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this 'story', more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty times, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading than the BBC. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to fight: "...fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. The BBC have apologised and both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet' is self evidently nonsense. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. They are not motivated by a quest for truth. Neither is Trump (a firehose of BS). For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him exactly where to go, shows a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...