Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear AnnaJ - I am often described as Bubbly -

> is it so bad?

>

>

> Not so - it's people who would describe themself

> on first meeting as "a bit wacky, kooky, bubbly,

> always up for a laugh, me!"


Oh god, you couldn't be more right!

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> annaj Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I?m completely with you on comic sans.

> > It?s the typeface of Bubbly and Wacky people,

>

> Oh dear AnnaJ - I am often described as Bubbly -

> is it so bad? :'(


Well, you could be could be called bubbly I suppose. Personally, I'd go for engaging, scintillating, vivacious or vibrant to describe you.

No offense caused I trust ;-)

Ahhhh, I think I have killed this thread ... so I am going to re-start it...


At 7, my teacher said that while I couldn't physically fight bullies, I had a razor-sharp tongue. And throughout secondary school I infuriated teachers by doing well while distracting everyone else and as one teacher put it "flying by the seat of my pants". Twenty years on I think I am much the same .... but I have learnt to bite my tongue and the pants have got bigger!


So my question:

How did people's teachers describe them in reports and suchlike and more importantly twenty, thirty years on - were they right?

Bright, lazy and frustrating pretty much summed up every single teacher's opinion.

In fact my reference from Mr Cossy (spits) for my ucas/pcas applications said pretty much exactly that, meaning 8 out of the 9 institutions didn't even offer me a place. Tosser!!

Insolent was a word that used to come up on mine quite often. Which is teacher speak for telling your parents, ?I don?t like being made to look stupid by your gobby little brat.?


Pa was a headmaster so he knew exactly what it meant and would only encourage me.


Come to think of it there may be a reason he didn?t send to his school. :-S

mockney piers Wrote:


> In fact my reference from Mr Cossy (spits) for my

> ucas/pcas applications said pretty much exactly

> that, meaning 8 out of the 9 institutions didn't

> even offer me a place. Tosser!!


Oh I hear you Mockney.... Mr Ward predicted me a C in English - I am convinced purely out of spite - and so only Warwick accepted me; everywhere else rejected me. And who the hell wants to go to a university that will accept a student no other place wants. So I rejected Warwick.


So I got an A in my A-Level; went to Africa, came back and did rather well in English Literature and Drama from one of the universities that originally rejected me.


God I can't believe how cross I still am. I could actually swear at this precise moment.

Again similar tales, my shitforbrains economics teacher predicted me an E/N for the simple crime of not being my older brother, whom he had liked, as far as I could tell.

I got an A.

He didn't even have the decency to look me in the eye when he came down on results day to congratulate everyone. Yep, I'm still pretty annoyed too.

Coulddobetter Musttryharder Coulddosowellifsheonlytried pretty much standard on all my reports.


Perhaps those of us that found our talents considered a bit upside down by the system in our formative years are more likely to turn out to feel as though we're looking at the system from the outside when grown up?


Er, something about me... I can spread the toes on my right foot, but not my left. Not very useful.

"Perhaps those of us that found our talents considered a bit upside down by the system in our formative years are more likely to turn out to feel as though we're looking at the system from the outside when grown up?"


A valid point moos, though I'll stick with Lazy Tardy Liberals ;)


I will say that reading Catch 22 was a bit of a life-defining moment when I realised that systems and authority figures really were petty and absurd and I wasn't alone in thinking that. My mind has not changed much since then.

mockney piers Wrote:


I realised that systems

> and authority figures really were petty and absurd

> and I wasn't alone in thinking that. My mind has

> not changed much since then.


Agreed Mockney... it dawned on me recently that the last person to successfully "manage" me was Andrew (my friend from forum drinks) - and that was only because our friendship was more important than the job. Since then I have had problems with every single manager I have ever had ... though my publishing boss was astute enough to understand me and while he and I both know I was hell to work with at the end, he remains a close friend.


Freelance and contract work is the only way forward....

Hello BB!


Your friend Andrew is a peach. Hope he does end up moving to ED, and I'm sure I know at least one nice chap to introduce him too.


OK, now just because we're all in danger of agreeing with each other here (You're so right! No, you're righter!) I have to say that all this 'authority sucks' thing is quite true, but there are down sides to the general move away from respect for authority, aren't there? For eg, there was a thread on here recently about parents giving their kids better discipline and boundaries, teachers can barely control their classes, many people automatically distrust and dislike the police (who are supposed to be public servants)... anarchy is a beautiful thing but only if, er, everyone is terribly NICE.


*awaits bullet*

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I will say that reading Catch 22 was a bit of a

> life-defining moment when I realised that systems

> and authority figures really were petty and absurd

> and I wasn't alone in thinking that. My mind has

> not changed much since then.


That just brought back a memory of reading catch-22 in maths class and spontaneously laughing out loud at something in the book. I had the book slid inside my file as I wasn?t supposed to be reading during the lesson. The teacher came to see what I was laughing at, took my book away and sent me to the office for a caning. I ended up in the deputy head?s office explaining myself. Turned out it was his favourite book so he let me off with a ?don?t do it again.?

Moos Wrote:


I have to say that all this

> 'authority sucks' thing is quite true, but there

> are down sides to the general move away from

> respect for authority, aren't there? ... anarchy is a beautiful thing but only

> if, er, everyone is terribly NICE.

>



Oh Moos you're so righter! I like boundaries, I like learning from other people who have more experience and more knowledge than me, I respect people in that position....

But in my experience the problem comes when those in authority cling to their position, and when challenged or questioned (which I always do out of curiosity and from a place of goodwill to begin with) feel threatened and so shut down dialogue with me. And it's when I feel I am not being listened to, or I'm not able to make a full contribution, that I start to get bored... and then restless ... and then cross....


Yes A is a perfect peach! As are you my dear Moos. x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...