Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the point is to throw the audience a bone, not stroke your own.


So Queen (monarch and band), Bond, Bean (not Sean, but vaguely amazed his recent ubiquity didn't pop up), Chariots of Fire, industrial revolution, bucolic myths, rich cultural post war heritage, internet all tick a million boxes internationally (however polarising some of them may be for a domestic audience) and we have plenty more to choose from.

Like Jeremy I think a lighter touch on the NHS might have been more appropriate,


But hey, a minor quibble on what was after all a good thing that could have been the usual awful fare as Bob said.

The NHS segment was actually called "Second star on the right and straight on til morning" and was a celebration of the NHS (and Great Ormond St, which probably completely flummoxed any non-UK viewer), but it also was a homage to the wealth of UK children's literature. The NHS bit was really only the first few minutes making the logos out of beds. After that, we were into the kiddy book dream sequence which was the more substantial part of the segment. Small child in hospital goes to sleep and dreams of Voldemort, Cruella deVille, Captain Hook and the Queen of Hearts, before a host of Harry Potter witches fly down, transforming into Mary Poppins and fight Voldemort.


Really, the NHS bit was only part of it. I thought the logos weren't entirely necessary, but the rest of the segment was very good, but didn't look as good on telly as it could of.

Yeah, Mary Poppins, Harry Potter (whatever my feelings on the matter) Peter Pan are hugely iconic internationally, fair game for sure. A massive Winnie the Pooh under a blue ballon would have melted me in fond nostalgia!!


I dunno, that NHS bit was still a bit "Kazakhstan Kazakhstan number one exporter of potassium! Other countries have inferior potassium."

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was I the only one who saw the (what I thought

> obvious) metaphor in that?


if you mean; children being cared for by the nice nhs, scared because evil monsters (cameron and tories) are coming to take away their safe haven....then no, you weren't.


If i'm way wide of the mark, then perhaps yes, you were

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No that?s what I got. And then Mary Poppins clones

> herself many times over and parachutes in to save the day.


But surely the nice NHS people did nothing to save the children - it was the lovely Mary Poppins the nanny. Could it not be read then that the metaphor was that the nice traditional English nanny fought against the nasty cheap, imported au pairs?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Really, the NHS bit was only part of it. I

> thought the logos weren't entirely necessary, but

> the rest of the segment was very good, but didn't

> look as good on telly as it could of.


Now you're just trying to wind me up...

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Really, the NHS bit was only part of it. I

> > thought the logos weren't entirely necessary,

> but

> > the rest of the segment was very good, but

> didn't

> > look as good on telly as it could of.


Is that en aitch es or en haitch es?

OMG - we've just got Silver in mens team gymnastics final - according to the BBC the first medal since a Bronze in 1912!


Huzzah for the Olympics


(wipes away tear)


ETD Shit - the japanese have protested about something and we've got Bronze - still a great achievement though.

Felt really bad for him, after all he's been through - they gave it a good go, but at the end of the day they didn't do the business.


But don't forget that we still have the individual competition to go. I don't think he's overhyped, he's obviously one of the top guys, but that doesn't mean he's nailed on for a medal.

To be honest I feel a little sorry for the Badminton disqualificationees. Playing tactically is part of many sports - it was always a problem in football when teams knew they had already qualified and were aiming to avoid the better teams in the next round. Isn't this a problem with the way the competition is organised rather than being down to the individual competitors? By playing for the lesser opposition were those players not actually playing for gold?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...