Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Presumably the owner of the house which has the side wall where the mural was painted would have to agree to another one?


I think that would be brilliant. I'd be happy to contribute to a collection to pay for it :) well pay for the paint anyway :))


EDIT: Or maybe we could drop a few hints to Banksy :))

Oh goodness me have I missed out on a class debate? *rolls eyes*


I think it's funny that some of the newcomers to ED dont even know what half of us are talking about (references to the Blame painting on side of Goose Green house)... It just shows that ignorance goes both ways.



PreferToRemainAnon get your facts right before you jump into a debate about something you obviously have never seen or know anything about LOL.


Louisa.

Well how would "newcomers" (sic) know what was being talked about if they have never seen the mural in question before it was painted over???


Why is that funny??


Why does everyone have to have a go at everyone else, I only asked a straightforward question FFS.


:-S

Apparently she is feeling a bit sore after having a moment in Foxtons, while eating her free fish & chips from Seacow. Something to do with her high horse falling off its soap box while choking on principles......


Getting back on thread (and freely admitting that I had got the EDT mural mixed with the GG mural) it is now in a fetching candy stripe sort of configuration, albeit it white on off-white. Although the mural was looking a bit past its best, I don't think that they (presumably the owners) have made things any better. Perhaps a second coat of whitewash is being planned..?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shut yer cakehole.

>

> Louisa.


xxxxx


Sorry you seem to be having such a bad day, I usually find a nice walk in the park watching the birds and the squirrels makes me feel better :)


Or perhaps you could feed the ducks :) That might cheer you up :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, I agree with this, it's been very odd indeed. Why did they fly so many kites and brief for so long before the budget? And why was she set on raising income tax, even tho the OBR had upgraded the forecast? And why the speech (which apparently caused gilts to fall), and then the retraction? And then why the business about mansplaining and misogyny in the Treasury? It's been totally baffling, esp when you consider that, in the end, the budget was quite unremarkable.  But I do see that, if Reeves had revealed that the forecast wasn't so bad, but that she wanted to keep enough headroom anyway, it would have gone down like a bag of sick with the media. She was damned either way.  All this briefing and flip-flopping has just slowed the markets and probably spurred people on to move savings and pensions, hold off on selling their house / buying etc. 
    • and as has been pointed out on another thread, the 'news' has become a matter of (subjective) opinion rather than fact.
    • No the leaks came after the apocalyptic of some on here - the whole leak/non leak and obr problem aren’t great - but ultimately a wash and not that relevant.     journalists should be analysing what the budget did and didn’t do but as per everything since 2016 is just personal psychodrama and college-boy sniggering 
    • Oh well.  At least an increasingly aged population will be happy in their £2M family homes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...