Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wasn't there a post recently from Renata saying that, due to staffing issues at Peckham, they would not be delivering post every day but would be collecting it daily from postboxes? That, combined with the national suspension of Saturday deliveries, has cut down the frequency of deliveries.
We haven?t had any post for over a week - it was my daughter?s birthday on Saturday and none of the cards or presents that family had posted well in advance have arrived yet. Understandable that there are delays and disruption to the service but surely we should be getting more than one delivery a week?

Just a Note on pickup from post boxes. I went to the postbox a 14.00 last week

to find the post van had picked up, when i tapped on his window and ask him if he could take my letter

the reply was put it in the post box and drove off. The post box said 17.00 pick up, its not

the first time this has happened. Most post office staff are very friendly and help you . NOT THIS ONE

Reply to above. The post box said 17.00 not 14.00. Any person posting a

letter knowing its 17.00 would get it to the post box before that time.

Hoping it would be there in a couple of days, but already one day now gone.

As for social distancing, it was the passenger side and only had to open window

2 inches.

The stated collection time is that of the final collection of the day from the box. That doesn't preclude there being an additional earlier one. What you could have checked is the removable metal tag that states just the name of the day of the next scheduled collection. That would, I guess, at 14:00 have remained unchanged.


That said, I did notice one day last week that the tag on my local box, at least ten minutes before the stated last collection time, had already been changed to the next day. That can occasionally happen, I guess when there are staff shortages and pressure against overtime. Usually the final collection seems to be made a little later than its scheduled time.

Hi all, below is my post from the other thread on the same subject. There are still delays. Post does turn up eventually, I had one item take 5 weeks!

Renata



I've just spoken to a member of staff at Peckham Sorting Office. Unfortunately they are very short staffed due to a high level of sickness. Additionally. use of postal services are far higher than usual. They currently have a huge backlog of post. A fortnight delay to post can be expected for some items. (As well as delays in Peckham there are also delays at all points in the postal service chain) On-foot deliveries are typically only happening every 4 days on each round in SE22/SE15. Saturday deliveries have been suspended. They apologise for the delay and say that post should turn up eventually.

Renata

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re the high level of sickness, I read recently

> that Peckham had the highest level of virus

> sickness in London (I may have misremembered this

> - it may have been in Southwark).

Peckham is the worst hit area of Southwark. From 6th May

https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/coronavirus-deaths-southwark-areas-revealed/

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Re the high level of sickness, I read recently

> > that Peckham had the highest level of virus

> > sickness in London (I may have misremembered

> this

> > - it may have been in Southwark).

> Peckham is the worst hit area of Southwark. From

> 6th May

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/coronavirus-d

> eaths-southwark-areas-revealed/



Yes, thanks, I did know that but as for a while at least Southwark was also the worst hit area of London, I wondered whether Peckham may have also - then or more recently - been the area with the highest level in London.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...