Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can anyone point me in the direction of any books or where to start with teaching my 3 year old to read? We have a 2hr 'quiet' time after lunch whilst his younger brother sleeps and we read books/do lego etc but mostly he LOVES to watch tv....I think we could/should spend our time more usefully!! I know children learn to read using a phonics system but am clueless how/where to start. Any pointers?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25458-teaching-a-3-year-old-to-read/
Share on other sites

I'd also be interested in hearing top tips for this? My son isn't quite two but he loves books; chats away constantly and is getting really good with his colours and numbers and shapes - so I thought I should at least know the basics when the time comes. And yes, I was a swot too!!
They use the phonics system to gently introduce letters/sounds in school nursery, so from age 3/4ish. The cr?che my kids went to when they were smaller (from 2) also used phonics. No harm in starting young if they seem interested in my opinion, but at the same time it's not worth forcing it on them.

All I know is that I could read and write at around 3/4 before I started in reception (teacher mum!) and I know that I was pleased that I could!! I would just like to give him the opportunity - using the right/recognised techniques. Fair enough if he is not interested! Currently he knows the letters that start his and his brothers names and that's it....but randomly can 'sing' the alphabet song! God knows where he learnt that...but it makes me worry for what goes on at preschool!


Can you buy Jolly phonics books?

Jolly Phonics do a dvd of about 8 stories introducing the letter sound groups. A bit basic compared to cbeebies but my eldest loved them. She soon realised I'd put this on at times when I didn't really want her watching MORE cbeebies but as it was educational, she got away with it.


She now seems good at reading - not sure if there's a link or not.

There is a big fat jolly phonics book that runs through the sounds ... Plus cd and YouTube films as people have said.


Also ladybird books have several relevant series - all mine have enjoyed an Abc book and another series where they tell the story themselves... Plus some phonics

Snick snack sniffle nose clip clap troll


Will see if I can find links

Hi,


I'm a big fan of this book

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reading-Lesson-Teach-Child-Lessons/dp/0913063029/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1346870179&sr=8-1


... which is called "Teach your child to read in 20 lessons", if the Amazon link doesn't work.


We used Jolly Phonics as well once my daughter started in Reception, but I still prefer this book which takes the old-fashioned approach of starting with words like 'cat', 'dog', etc, and gradually builds up. (I know Jolly Phonics is fun and a lot of kids take to it, but it just seemed like a lot of extra stuff to have to learn! But I'm not knocking it, I know it works for a lot of kids.)


You can buy all the Jolly Phonics stuff online, Amazon has everything as usual. If you know that your son's school uses Jolly Phonics, it's probably no harm making the investment now to buy the pack. (Basically, the workbooks 1-7 and the CD with the songs. There's other stuff too, but less useful imo).


Having said that... having re-read your post, it sounds like he might not be quite ready for these materials yet? If not ready for these, then start with letters and matching letters to sounds. There are lots of pre-school books in places like WH Smith appropriate for this level. Tracing over letters and saying the names, associating objects with the first letter of their names (C is for cat, etc). Also the Cbeebies magazine usually has pre-reading activities like this, and then the kids get all the stickers and toys etc.


hope that helps

Claire

My own children were a bit older than 3 when I used the Peter and Jane series by Ladybird to help them recognise letters and read.


The books are a bit vintage now I suppose but my children really enjoyed them. I was often asked by their teachers at primary school what I had done to help with their reading/writing.

Hmmm I asked when O started nursery & they said "leave it to us, it's what we are here for"!! I think with phonics it's important you understand the way it works. Otherwise I'd focus more on instilling a love of books - they did a great course at my girls school about reading and how to approach it - a snippet - cant pass it all on - let your child choose the book & ask them why / what made them choose it (cover, pictures inside etc). Read the blurb on the back if there is one. Discuss the cover and/or images inside and the characters, what they think might happen. Read the story & then discuss themes etc. ask questions to check the child understood the story.


As they get older & are reading to you when you flip through before starting to read point out any potentially tricky words & discuss so they can hopefully deal with them when reading to you later. This is when the questioning at the end matters even more as reading without actually taking in the story / understanding it can be a common problem. I think the approach can work for any age adapted accordingly & it does seem to change the dynamic when you actually start to discuss books in this way. You get some really interesting & unexpected answers!


Pre school I think I'd focus on numbers 1-10 - ensure they recognise all numbers & also know what number comes before or after each one too. This is something quite easy to teach that you can't really go wrong with.


With phonics it isn't always entirely straightforward and I think (may be wrong) that there is potential to cause confusion so the reading to instil the love of books & maybe simple things like being able to write their own name are less daunting areas to focus on (or maybe I'm just a lazy, bad, bad Mummy who is good at coming up with random justifications for it!!). LOL.

Peter and Jane books are good for words that need to be recognised (rather than sounded out) such as LIKE and THE.


For phonics I like the Dandelion books, you can get them at www.phonicbooks.co.uk


My 3 year old taught herself to read so I don't think 3 is too young. She did spend 2 years watching her sister figure it out which helped.

NL: I think as well as a love of books, starting to recognise the sounds in words (playing I spy something beginning with b) and the parent using the sounds rather than just the letter names, is a useful precursor.


I didn't regard it as my 'job' to teach no 1 to read, he was always so active our time together was always more park/swimming/collecting sticks rather than Anything else, but all the talking, songs, reading together obviously laid the foundation because once he started reception and learnt phonics, he was reading within 6 weeks.


Twin 2, who learnt phonics already (nursery) starts reception next week, and I realised yesterday, reading a cbeebies mag with those little people with sounds written on their tummies, that she can Already sound out/read easy words!!

I tend to agree with Molly - I felt that as I didn't know anything about phonics better to leave that to the experts (nursery at school)(though maybe this is lazy working mum justification!!). Agree good to encourage looking at bits of books and discussing what happened.
Think Nappy Lady is spot on. Reading with children is so important and there are so many amazing books out there. It's nice to share poetry and non fiction as well as stories. My 3 year old loves Michael Rosen and the Oxford First poetry books. There's nothing wrong with talking about letter sounds (schools focus on this before letter names) especially if mini sb shows an interest. E loves spotting letters everywhere, road signs shops etc and numbers in front doors. We have some magnetic letters and and board (ELC) that E likes to 'write' her name with and sometimes she finds a letter and we say the sound. Jolly Phonics is not used in all schools but it's worth looking at the you tube clips. The problem is lots of schemed reading books are pretty dire! Apparently the Ministry of Letters is a good dvd, not tried it yet though.

Cool thanks - just to be clear I'm not really into hot housing him - it's more that we have this 2 hr period when we are in after lunch and I thought it would be worth a try - otherwise I get pestered for Ben 10 on tv!!


Yes, numbers are a good start - that's easy enough!!

We've started to use a game for the computer called Big Cat Phonics. Not sure if it's widely available to be honest as my teacher mother gave it to us. 3.5yo loves it. Also loves reading so agree reading together is the most important at this age. Alphablocks is brilliant though!


If you're interested in buying learning to read books, I work locally as an independent Usborne rep selling Usborne books. At the moment I have a really fantastic offer on the Very First Reading box set. Usborne's reading program follows the synthetic phonics as taught in school and slowly builds up as the child's ability and confidence grows starting with the Very First Reading series.


The Very First Reading box set is 15 books, number 1 starting with the first sounds working up to the point where the child can read on their own. Retail is ?74.85 but I have it at the moment for ?29.99. It's a really beautiful set too. Poster attached and do look on the website for more info.


PM me if you're interested, I can deliver free locally or indeed show you a sample set before you buy. Don't buy on the website or you won't get the special offer!

http://www.usborne.com/catalogue/catalogue.aspx?cat=1&area=vfr&subcat=vfr&id=4618

Hiya, here is a website which I find quite fun to look at (and then only do about 1% of what it recommends):

http://www.brillkids.com/ They sell rather expensive software (I tried the free trial, it was fun but in 10days with a 9months year old, what did you think the results would be like? :)) Anyway, there is a forum & a fair few free resources, which are quite good. When I was little, my mum used lots of games build into normal days to get me learning stuff, e.g. having numbers "races" while walking the dog, etc.

mx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...