Jump to content

Petition for statue of former Peckham resident


Recommended Posts

You may have seen the news earlier this week that King's College took down its statue of Thomas Guy from its Guy's campus on account of his having profiteered from slavery.


I have started a petition, asking them to use this opportunity to commission a statue to King's alumnus and former Peckham resident Dr Harold Moody.


Petition here: http://chng.it/SWjFgvgZ - please sign and share.


Moody was born in Kingston, Jamaica, in 1882, and then trained in medicine at King's. Despite finishing top of his class, he was unable to secure employment on account of the colour of his skin (or, to be accurate, becuase of people's attitude to the colour of his skin) and so set up his own practice in Peckham. He also founded and became the president of the League of Coloured Peoples, which campaigned for racial equality and civil rights. He was also organised in organising in his local community during the Second World War, tending to injured victims at bomb sites and saving lives.


He died in his home in Peckham shortly after the war in 1947.


This is the kind of person we should be celebrating with statues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed it would be a fine memorial to a remarkable man.


Thomas Guy, like many many people at the time, invested in the South Sea Company which was primarily a government debt holding company. The company was also awarded the monopoly on selling slaves amd goods to the Spanish colonies, but due to the Spanish war of succession the company never really got this trade underway or made much money from it. Guy's money was mainly made in trading government debt and being lucky enough tl get out before the South Sea Bubble burst.


His main crime in my view was he did not care or perhaps realise how the company he invested in intended to make a profit on his investment. Something many of us continue to be guilty of today.


I don't think it totally negates the good he did by using the money he made to found Guy's Hospital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep I realise that! I think all this current debate is good and positive as it allows us to question assumptions. It should also make us examine our own assumptions. People like Thomas Guy saw nothing wrong with investing in companies who intended to sell slaves. How many of us think too deeply about where our cheap clothes and electronic goods come from and why they are cheap.


History may judge us just as harshly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BornAgainSELondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely agree. We could all do with paying

> closer attention to the ethics of the companies we

> choose to patronise - be that clothes, food,

> electrical goods, banks or whatever.

>

> Question everything.


The information about the exploitation of poor people for profit has been readily available for decades. Shops will still open tomorrow and people will go there in droves.

The hair market alone is a prime example

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/oct/28/hair-extension-global-trade-secrets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all need to question where people invested and made their money. In today's climate, where are our electronic goods and clothes being made. Are they being made in factories with no workers rights. Are they exploiting children? This in itself is a type of slavery ......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree that now is the time to reflect if anything we do supports modern day slavery like trainers made by child slave labour, electronics and some nail bars. Seems a much better idea rather than another statue (to yet another dead male) that a scholarship to encourage local BAME kids to consider / help a career within medicine like the worthy Dr Moody would be a much better idea.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone deserves a statue it is certainly Dr Harold Moody. I haven?t signed though because I question the whole concept of putting up statues to individuals, it seems a somewhat outmoded form of commemoration. Dr Moody has a park named after him and there is a plaque on the house in Queens Road where he lived and practiced, in these ways he is still a part of a living community. I question the idea of putting anyone literally on a pedestal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that people are reluctant to sign because they just have a bad taste in the mouth when anything with the word ?statue? is involved. It just puts people off, even if they are generally OK people. How about a fund for a scholarship in his name, or a grant for teachers of biology and other sciences, or a room in the hospital that can be used by visiting relatives of patients and with a plaque/permanent exhibition?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone who has signed and shared the petition. Since I started it, Southwark Council has announced an ?anti-racism audit? of public statues and street names, so I?ve let the relevant councillor know about the petition. If you know anyone else who might be inclined to sign, please spread the word. (Do remind people to check their junk mail form verification emails, though.)


I posted on the forum simply to spread the word of something I thought uncontroversial, not to start a squabble. But I guess that?s akin to saying ?I came to the pool for a swim, not to get wet?.


Anyway, thanks for your feedback. In response, I guess I?d like to say this:


- I?m not suggesting that putting up a statue of a Black person will even begin to address the huge problem this country has with racism (I?ve educated myself enough about the nature of systemic racism to know better than this); I merely think he is a worthy recipient of memorialisation. Of course, there are bigger fish to fry (and yes, as the Careers Lead at my school, I am all too aware of the need to find ways to get more Black kids into top universities), but when I heard that Guy?s statue had come down, I saw an opportunity to try to do something positive and start a conversation about other people we could be celebrating.


- I agree that the whole concept of putting up statues and literally putting people on pedestals is problematic, but statues do - and will continue to - exist, so if we can replace some of the statues of bad white people (and to be clear, here I specifically mean white people who have track records of being bad, not that all white people are bad - let?s not get into that right now) with some Black people, that?d be a tiny step in the right direction. After all, we have to work with the tools that we have.


- Yes, it is infuriating that the overwhelming majority of statues are of men. Ideally, I?d be pushing for a woman of colour, but for this *particular* purpose I thought it needed to be somebody connected to King?s, and, as a King?s alumnus, Moody seemed the stand-out choice. Were we talking about a statue or memorial in another part of the borough, I?m sure there are some brilliant women of colour we could - and should - celebrate. If anyone has any in mind, please share them here as I would love to learn about them - and then we should suggest them to the council?s anti-racism audit.


- I?m not even going to get into the debate about ethical consumer choices. It is one I?m interested in and very conscious of myself but right now I?m just trying to get support for a statue of a local hero.


Anyway, if people want to sign the petition, I?m grateful; if they don?t, that?s fine. I hope nobody would feel any pressure or judgement from anyone else here.


Peace. x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I Quite disagree with some of these posts, to take down a statue and want to replace it with another.

I say why in all of Southwark why pick on one man when Southwark has many that could be there, like

Henry Cooper as one. Im not being silly just honest, Max Bygraves as another.

On these Bases that they stood on why not modern art, there are plenty of Artists in Southwark that would love

to see there work on displayed, So Kings Its your ground look into this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...