Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am a member of JAGS too and quite like the little gym & pool. The staff have always been pretty friendly and for ?34 a month I think it's good value.


However, I like to play Badminton but the people I tend to rope in to play a game are non members and the first time we played I did not realise it was ?8 per guest, rather than ?8 for the court (which is free to JAGS members)


Therefore ended up paying ?24 between 4 of us for a game of Badders!


Now stick to singles matches rather than doubles...so if there are any other JAGS members who fancy a game let me know!

Thanks Martinchiversfanclub


I noticed the other day that there is an open session for Badminton players on Thursday evening and there seemed to be plenty of players down there having games. I think I may drop by one Thursday soon and see how I get on - will let you know and perhaps see you there!

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bon3yard wrote:I need to find an alternative pool

> to the one at east dulwich fusion(Which closes

> soon for refurb), any decent sized ones relatively

> close to Lordship lane?

>

> Alleyne's is probably the nearest.


Is there a pool at Alleynes? You don't mean James Allens (Jags)_do you? I am a member at Jags but never go because it's a tad too far but if there was a pool at Alleynes that would be perfect. Is it just a pool or do they have a gym too?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...