Jump to content

Recommended Posts

we need more cats. lots more cats to deal with this MENACE.


Fsailing that, lets get the populace tooled up and deal with this avaian scum ourselves.


First the pigeons, then we can move onto shoplifters and burgulars. scum that do not deserve to live.


lets get organised and clean up our manor

There is quite often a problem with pigeons in my road, and lots of them were roosting on parts of my house, under the eaves and on window sills. I installed plastic spikes which worked. They aren't a particularly amusing topic as they are vermin. Southwark has posted several prominent signs around which say do not feed the pigeons - apparently it is against the law.

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Call Carter

>

> Oh,no....

>

> On second thoughts, he only shoots the Clay ones


I'm Ren?, Ren's distant French cousin (twice removed).


Carter has specified he is an engineer, therefore not qualified to keep the pigeon population under control. So why do you suggest we call for Carter?


Can you clarify what you meant by call Carter ...he only shoots clay ones. Are you suggesting he's trigger happy?


Please keep in mind any possible libelous or offensive claims or I'll Section 127 vous

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Southwark has posted several prominent

> signs around which say do not feed the pigeons -

> apparently it is against the law.



maybe the pigeons didn't get the 'o' level grades they wanted in English and as a result they can't read the signs !

> Failing that, lets get the populace tooled up and deal with this avian scum ourselves.

> First the pigeons, then we can move onto shoplifters and burgulars. scum that do not deserve to live.


First of all, the shoplifting pigeons. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/north_east/6907994.stm

  • 2 weeks later...

ah, susancarpenter, welcome back. Think of it thus:


(Pigeon gets on Tube, say at South Ken)

Ticket inspector gets on Tube at Gloucester Rd: "Have your tickets ready for inspection, please!"

Pigeon - coo!

Ticket inspector to pigeon - Have you paid your FARE?

Pigeon - coo!

(Tube doors open at Earl's Court, pigeon disembarks and flies off, having paid not a cent in FARES)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...