Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I frequently take my dog on the bus/train/tube because I don't own a car and without a car I have no way of getting the dog to the vet or bringing her with me for extended periods of time other than by public transport. I keep her on my lap or as close to me as possible on the ground, and always on a lead. Dogs are allowed on public transport and whilst I agree that owners need to be responsible and aware of other passengers' personal space/comfort, non dog owners also need to CHILL - OUT and realise that sniffing is how a dog comes to understand its surroundings. In my experience, other passengers' children have caused me greater distress on public transport than naturally curious pet dogs.


Agreed, dogs should always be on a lead in public (except at the park/in areas where you are actually allowed to let them off. Exercise = good).

WARNING! Here is a rant from an anti-dog man.....! Turn away now if you love doggies!


My interpretation of what occurred was that it was a violent incident that occurred because two (note that..TWO owners) could not control their dogs (on, or off, the lead). In my, anti dog, view, the violence is that of the owners!! Why didn't the Police arrest them both?


As a life long runner, I have been using public parks for decades, and I am very fed up of inneffective owners telling me that the dog that has just chased me, nipped me, barked/growled at me, is "really a nice dog, and very friendly" (So, of course, I must be a horrible, animal hating and unreasonable person)


The latest incident that I endured was in Chiswick park, on a saturday morning, when we entered a cricket field that had been effectively taken over by dog owners, who obviously knew each other as regular saturday dog walkers. We had a 5 year old boy with us, who was bowled over by a fast moving dog, the same size as him, and who was very scared and shaken. He spent the rest of the day shying away from any dog that came close. In my opinion, that was an assault on the child by the owner. And..lets not even talk about the numerous park cafe's taken over by groups of doggie owners on week ends.


I am clearly an insane, embittered, odd bod, who has not developed the natural English love of our canine friends.


I believe it to be a sign of our insanity, that we will cull Badgers, but not dogs!


Looking forward to many "animated" replies,


Yours


R N Gutsell

If you are referring to the original posting, then only one person had their dogs off the lead. The other dog was being controlled. Why should the police arrest them both?


No one should have to put up with being nipped by someone else's dog - so why don't you report them? Take a picture of them and their owner. Unfortunately there are a lot of people out there who don't control their dogs, thankfully mine doesn't run after bikes or runners. You can't lump all dogs and their owners into the same category, but you obviously are.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...