Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No, DM I think it deoends on income...the plan these days is to give bursaries to people who couldn't afford to go to the schools, rather than scholarships to people who might be rich anyway. That's partly due to the government threatening to take away charitable status of the schools.

Alleyn's wasn't fully fee paying until Wilson abolished the direct grant grammars (which it used to be, like Manchester Grammar) in 1977-ish. It like Dulwich was 90% free places until about 1970.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lovely Asset indeed they do, but I believe that

> they are only worth about 15% off the fees now.


Scholarships to the public schools are awarded for educational merit, irrespective of the parents' income, and the highest achieving children in the entrance examination are invited to sit a further test followed by an intervew. Bursaries are awarded on a means tested basis and are available to anyone who is offered a place at the schools but whose parents cannot afford the fees. At the time my daughter transferred to secondary school four years ago, she was offered the maximum scholarship for Alleyn's, which was 33% off the fees. A friend of hers was given a 100% bursary to Alleyn's because her family income was very low.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have to disagree with the Plough once being nice... altho I hear it's much better these days :p



I'm talking about before it was The Goose and Granite. It used to be a proper pub, but the building was gutted and transformed beyond recognition. I remember going there as a kid and the garden being nice. So there :p ;-)

We've lived in the area for almost 40 years and as kids we had a few more places to mix in the area like Darrell Rd youth club, Brownies in the church at the top of Barry RD, the youth club by the wood yard on Barry Rd or simply just playing on the streets, or going to the woods etc, and trust me as kids we weren't concerned who went to what schools when it was time to play...However kingsdale always had it's scuffles as well as Peckham girls, but in E Dulwich I think we kids were in a play world of our own,...nipping in and out of each others houses, going to the youth club in E Dulwich Estate and the open air playground on Dog Kennel Hill.....sadly there's nowhere for the E Dulwich kids to go and mix today....the streets are not safe, and even when they go to the park they have to be escorted by mums, and you hardly see kids walking and talking on there way to school in groups as they are all escorted in big cars...we used to walk from Barry Rd to Dulwich Village school without parents...as a mum now, I often feel sad for my young child, and the lack of fun, uninhibited , carefree times he wont have, forgeing strong friendships and building heartwarming child hood playtime memories, without being overshadowed by his mum

Dear Growleybear,


That is good to know, I had heard otherwise from parents - and as my children are still so small, we are not yet in a rush to investigate further as we thought that scholarships were only offered in secondary school. I had read that independent schools had been forced to reduce the size of their burseries over the last few years in order to offer more of them, and I was under the impression that they were awarded on merit and not according to need.


We will not require financial support of any kind (clearly), but I imagine that a scholarship will look fabulous on my munchkins UCAS forms when they are applying to medical school.

According to my daughter who works in a foodie pub in Herne Hill only the working class clientele know how to control their children whom are expected to sit to attention at the table on best behaviour. The middle class permit their offspring to loudly run riot both in the pub and one was recently saved from the main road whilst brats so called parents were in the pub garden quaffing wine out of earshot and eyesight.

I find the working class people like me refreshingly more straight forward to deal with than many M/C counterparts.

I've forgotten the original question in my indignant rant, any way I have only been ed resident since 03.

Those schools are in Dulwich Village not East Dulwich! Anyway, there is a large private school in Catford, on the south circ- St Dunstans and one in Sydenham - Sydenham Girls, Westwood Hill. It's not just the super rich who use private schools - I know people who have lived in very, very modest houses and used their spare cash to privately educate their kids.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...