Jump to content

Recommended Posts

yet again on the back of a 15% price hike, BG announce 1/2 billion profits, how the fuck can they justify this. I appreciate they are a company and need to make a few bob but when families the length and breadth of the country are struggling to pay energy bills,surely the time has come for the gov,to get involved and sort out what is going on. the unfortunate thing is the energy companies have us by the knackers and dont they know it.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2689-british-gas-thieving-bastards/
Share on other sites

I can feel another free-market thread coming on after that one spadetownboy


You will get people saying that people's pensions are tied in with succesful companies so they need to do whatever etc etc


I'm aware of the arguments but for what it's worth I'm with you on this one

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These days it's less trouble to change your energy

> supplier than it is to post a complaint about

> British Gas, innit?


i changed a long time ago from british gas and basically change supplier every year, but the annoying this about these profits is that according to the news this morning, the majority were made early last year when wholesale gas prices were down but bg decided not to pass the decrease onto customers, morally thats not right, bit like not all the banks not passing on the recent interest rate cuts to mortages, and i,m still waiting for those bastard garages to drop their petrol prices even though oil prices are now down as well. right, rant over for this morning.

This price rise will make the headlines everywhere today: print and broadcast - just like all the other times it has happened (either with British Gas or any other company). And yet it will happen again and again.


The fact that British Gas are making so much money is not because they are thieving bastards, it's because people are lazy and have the memory span of a goldfish.


There's only so many times you can say to people "hey - spend two minutes on the internet or telephone and save ?150!" before you get bored of saying it and lose sympathy.

British are a bunch of thieving bastards and no mistake!!! I pay them ?35 to maintain my central heating and my combi boiler. I've had to call them out a couple of times in the last few months and have been charged an additional ?89 for a part to repair my boiler and another ?38 for a carbon monoxide detector, which I didn't ask them to supply, but apparently it is a legal requirement to have one. I wasn't given a choice, my wife was at home when all of this took place so I will be batting this back to them and asking them why I wasn't consulted first. I thought my ?35 covered everyting including parts and labour, clearly this is not the case!!! Gits.

ATG - go for it.

I believe, to be fair, that BG did reduce prices last year, or that's what I thought I heard on the Today programme earlier.

Wearing extra layers is a valid point. I know it's tangental to this thread, which is a chance for us to kick BG, but the less you use, the the less they get paid. *Bob* has a point too. I'm with nPower (or is it Npower?) and it's not that expensive (yet!). Nero

Nero, I had Npower knock on my door 3 times recently saying i MUST change supplier as they are the wholesaler and the cheapest, I almost fell for it the last time as the girl was cute blonde haired and blue eyed, then i just ended up slamming the door on her face as she was just talking a load of krap.
I had a similar experience of an extremely pushy nPower salesman on my doorstep - I use them for gas and he categorically stated that he could undercut my electricity bill even though he didn't know how much I was paying. When I pointed out that nPower were about to put up gas prices and how did I know that the same thing wouldn't happen if I used their electricity, he promised me that he had the power to keep my bills down no matter what! Around this point I asked him to leave!

Use BG properly then


I have the Homecare cover -s eems expensive, but....


it covers the taps/ CH/ Wiring/ Drains etc


Call them out rather than a plumber when you have a leaky tap or a bunged up drain - it soon makes sense



A stuck rad valve ? NO problem sir, all part of the service



A plumber would hit you for a hour + bits + vat = ?70

Im with British gas for both my gas and electrcity, My gas is not to bad as im now on a pre payment meter due to them estimating my bills,and getting me into debt,managed to get out of that debt and demanded they put a prepayment meter in.

Its my electricity im worried about which is quarterly.

Everything in my home is electric(except for the heating) i have considered getting a key meter but having a 4 year old and would rather no gas than electric so im staying quarterly but........Im dreading the bill last quarter was 267.00 proberley be bloody double this quarter

Totally agree they are Thieving Bastards

I'm a thieving bastard!


BG changed the meter 3 times at my last property and I received a bill showing a juicy ?500 credit. I queried it and they said it was correct. I pointed out that the meter changes were resetting to zero but they insisted it was correct. So I asked for a ?500 cheque which they sent and I promptly changed supplier to Atlantic Coal and Gas.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...