Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have to say I would count the Black Cherry as my favourtie place to go out on Lordship Lane as I love a well-made cocktail.. (& partly due to the fact it holds some very pleasant memories there!) and I would certainly be very upset to see it close... but like Keef I'd like to hear from the owners exactly what the problems are before writing petitions etc...

Also would like to say a Here Here on Mikese22 post about suggestions......!

Me too Katy. As you can see there are some right miserable bastards on this Forum. I like the Black Cherry although I haven't been in there for a few months. I do like their cocktails. It would be great if they could use the outside space at the back but it sounds to me like they are going to build an extension. Perhaps Angela could clarify?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Me too Katy. As you can see there are some right

> miserable bastards on this Forum. I like the Black

> Cherry although I haven't been in there for a few

> months. I do like their cocktails. It would be

> great if they could use the outside space at the

> back but it sounds to me like they are going to

> build an extension. Perhaps Angela could clarify?


haha took the words right out of my mouth Mr Lush (or Ms?). There are def a few Victor Meldrews on here. I for one would be upset if Cherry were to close. Where else can you get a Zombie cocktail?!

katy - you seem to have an interest in council planning appeals - a hobby of yours ? I see your first ever post was asking what the decison was on the on the neros situation a while ago.


a curiously obtuse first post some might ask.


some might also say that the the formal Black Cherry disclaimer notice serves more to arouse suspicions than to dampen it.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> scor46 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Snorky you definitely are Columbo...

>

>

> or on crack you're so paranoid. You're not the

> guy asking people for money on Grove Vale are

> you?!



Funny... Some people just happen to care Snorky...

lets pretend we are in court



in a criminal court, if I presented the a sequence of coincidences I have hightlighted earlier, The case would quite rightly be dismissed by the judge based on the maxim of beyond reasonable doubt


if however this was a civil case and based on balance of probability rule , then the outcome would likely be very different

Snorkdude,


calm it down buddy, this is a genuine cause and the people are who they say they are and they are not connected to phill props. The neighbours should understand that if the extention gets built then there will be no noise from garden drinking as the extension will be part of the main bar/building and noise will not be heard. Am i right BC?

Personally I can't help feeling sorry for the neighbours who are complaining about the potential noise of any change in usage.


They no doubt have homes and families and don't want their current living standards to be detrimentally affected by a change in a business's usage.


Bars are not the be-all and end-all of an area, the people who live here are though.

I know a group of guys who are fond of a small charity, financially supports its entire running costs.


Similarly the punters, who like BC so much and wants to support it, should visit it more often and just pay double the amount on their bill. That way the BC will have extra income with same number of punters without building the extension and it can continue in business. And everyone lives happily ever after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...