Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Poor transport effects everyone - Clearly people are going to illustrate the point by drawing on personal examples - my own, of how difficult it for me to meet work / childcare commitments (even though I only commute 4 miles), I am sure is a general problem shared by many others.

The potential negative effects of a tube, as described, are not inevitable.

Comparisons to outer London boroughs ignore the fact that there is far lower population density and that travelling a couple of miles in a car is much easier than it is in central London. Also, it's not true that outer boroughs are always worse served - many have high speed trains into town. It's pretty poor that someone travelling in from Surbiton can get to the Southbank quicker on public transport than someone in Camberwell, just a couple of miles away.

I just can't understand why individuals would want to hold back improvements to transport infrastructure.

There are some valid concerns regarding the knock on effects of getting a tube station, but there are clear, objective arguments why certain areas are good candidates for any further extensions. Camberwell has a particularly strong claim I think and this has been recognised for many years, but still it has never happened.

From a selfish point of view (if you want to call it selfish), I would like to see transport links improved in Southern East Dulwich - but would be happy just to see investment in places with a high need, even if it were elsewhere. What really upsets me is to taxpayers money being funnelled into propping up private housing developments in areas with little existing demand.


wavyline girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would appear that if you oppose the local tube

> station idea, you are described as "selfish."

> Well the arguments for a tube, as seen i've seen

> here, are equally as selfish.

wavyline girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well the arguments for a tube, as seen i've seen

> here, are equally as selfish


The argument for is:


-If you're investing in new transport infrastructure in densely populated, inner London areas south of the river, there are some clearly identifiable 'holes' based on population and existing provision which should be prime candidates.


....The argument against is:


-I don't want my area to change in character.


I actually don't call the latter argument selfish - I think it's perfectly reasonable to hold this concern, but certainly the former can be argued from a more detached, objective perspective.

forest hill has an overground station, just use that if you need the tube. camberwell would be the best place for a tube station but i always thought that south london's clay soil ruled it out altogether. failing camberwell what about dulwich village...

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> forest hill has an overground station, just use

> that if you need the tube. camberwell would be the

> best place for a tube station but i always thought

> that south london's clay soil ruled it out

> altogether. failing camberwell what about dulwich

> village...


But Forest Hill is only any use if you live in deepest south of East Dulwich and already well into zone 3. If you're in the main but you're better off using ED rail station or Peckham Rye or Denmark Hill rail or Overground, both in zone 2.

Of course some of this is about plugging the gap left when the third Crystal Palace line was pulled back in the '50s - trains ran:


Ludgate Hill (City Thameslink)

St Paul's

Elephant

Loughb J

D Hill

P Rye

Nunhead

Honor Oak (where the Wood Vale estate now is)

Lordship Lane

Upper Sydenham

C Palace


http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/h/honor_oak/

Yep, and the closure of Camberwell Station which lay on the same route (although it was closed earlier). It really is about time that this obvious demonstrable gap was closed.


Medley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course some of this is about plugging the gap

> left when the third Crystal Palace line was pulled

> back in the '50s - trains ran:

>

> Ludgate Hill (City Thameslink)

> St Paul's

> Elephant

> Loughb J

> D Hill

> P Rye

> Nunhead

> Honor Oak (where the Wood Vale estate now is)

> Lordship Lane

> Upper Sydenham

> C Palace

>

> http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/h/honor_oak/

I have family who live just north of Burgess Park, to the East of Walworth Road. It's less than a couple of miles from Central London and yet in rush hour it's very difficult to get on a bus, it's not a comfortable walk to a tube station and there is no overground. That's not great for an affluent, highly developed, world class city.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> London Overground is not really comparable to the

> tube. 4 trains an hour and barely enters zone 1.



All those selfish bastards in East London who demanded a tube extension to the Central Line in the 30s. They wrecked places like Gants Hill and Redbridge.


Er... actually they asked for this because the transport in the area was very overcrowded. Which is the reason that many people in ED would like to have a tube here, unlikely though this may.

I'm not either... that was a mistaken click of the mouse. Sorry Jeremy.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's not great for an

> > affluent, highly developed, world class city...

>

> Agreed, but not sure how that's related to my post

> which you replied to...

Plus the Overground service at HOP/FH has not arrived to the detriment of the Southern service to London B (albeit I'm still mourning the loss of the Charing X trains a bit) - so if all you need is the Jubilee line to head westwards, you've got 16 trains per hour or so to choose from. That really is turn up and go, the timetable becomes irrelevant.

HOP/FH aren't really the point though - if you are close to those stations then that's fine, especially FH which has trains direct to London Bridge as well as London Overground to Canada Whater.


However large numbers of people who aren't at the southern end of ED can't conveniently use those stations, and would have to pay more (Zone 3 vs Zone 2) even if they could change their route.


The issue is the lack of provision to central East Dulwich, and the overcrowding on buses and the services from ED rail station. A tube extension could alleviate that, and provide coverage for the other "hole" around Camberwell/Burgess Park, and could run further out to connect up other parts of South London.

HOP/FH only has 8 trains per hour on the Overground because it has two branches, one to Crystal Palace and the other to West Croydon.


While people lament the reduction in Southern services to 4 trains per hour, except the morning peak where 6 still operate, the peak trains are at least 8 to 10 carriages long on that line. ED/PR passengers still only have 8 carriages in the peak.


FH/HOP combined with the Overground has a tube style frequency of 12 trains per hour, in comparison to the 4tph from ED to London Bridge and the 4tph on the Overground's SLL from DH/PR. (DH also has 2tph to Victoria except late evenings and 2tph to the Thameslink core).

  • 3 weeks later...

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have family who live just north of Burgess Park,

> to the East of Walworth Road. It's less than a

> couple of miles from Central London and yet in

> rush hour it's very difficult to get on a bus,

> it's not a comfortable walk to a tube station and

> there is no overground. That's not great for an

> affluent, highly developed, world class city.


My idea alleviates this completely because I would have stations at Walworth East Street and Burgess Park (probably on the junction of Albany Road and Thurlow Street) then another halfway between this and New Cross Gate on the Old Kent Road.

I don't think one can compare the Overground service in south London to a tube service. The Overground is definitely useful particularly for commuting, but even setting aside the difference in frequency of trains, the seemingly constant engineering works mean that there's often limited or no weekend service anyway. That's true on both the Clapham Junction line and the Crystal Palace line - this weekend was a delight, finding that a return trip that should have taken about an hour and a half took twice that because the Overground was largely out of action.


By the way, here's a fun bit of info I was told by someone who works for TFL: contractors often book station/line closures for works, but don't necessarily carry out the works - something changes, and the date gets shifted. The stations remain closed, though, because they didn't bother to cancel the closures and tell anyone they won't be showing up. So that's good, isn't it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...