Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bignumber5 Wrote:


> *Removing bendies: reactionary bollocks.


I disagree about these buses - they are too long for London roads, and bus drivers are among the worst behaved drivers on the road, driving like maniacs from stop to stop. Putting them in charge of an articulated vehicle 15 metres long is a bad idea.


We all know that many cyclists run red lights - but plenty don't, including me (and I'm not quite sure what it's got to do with bendy buses, other than that every time transport issues are mentioned on a public forum, people start ranting about bicycles going through red lights) - I hope you're equally contemptuous of motorcyclists' illegal occupation of advanced stop boxes - nothing makes me want to jump a red light more than arriving in an advanced stop box to find it full of filthy polluting motorbikes.


Bendy bus drivers often overtake cyclists as they approach a bus stop, thus crushing the cyclist against the kerb. This has happened to me on a couple of occasions.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me the issue can be simplified slightly.

>

> Imagine the scenario, that hopefully will never happen. A major terrorist attack occurs in central London. Hundreds, if not thousands are dead. Widespread panic.

>

> Who would you want to see stepping through the smoke and rubble to try and bring the city back from the brink,


This has reminded me so much of Hilary Clinton's recent radio ad...


*Puts on deep American action movie trailer voice*


"While you sleep safely in your bed, there's a phone ringing somewhere... Blah blah blah... who do you want on the end of that line?" :-S


Just to add my 2p, I agree with Mike. Borris is a knob, that's obvious, and I won't be voting for him. However, I absolutely hate Ken, I really really do, and even if I agreed with ALL of his polocies (which I don't), I couldn't vote for the slimey jumped up little c**t!!!

I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of good resources (like the factcheck.org which keeps a track of US Presidential races) to allow the undecideds (like me) to make their minds up. Every discussion seems to be hugely polarised. I don't like Ken but I don't have any faith in Boris. I will probably vote for Paddick but I am also sure that it's my second choice which will be the one which winds up counting. And I have no idea who to give it to.


For what it's worth, I'm sorry that nobody from outside mainstream party politics has raised their hands and shown themselves to be a credible candidate. That surely gives a very poor message on the value placed on a contribution to British public life and London generally.

Oh right! Seems abit weird to pull someone up for a rant by having one yourself is all! MM is obviously quite passionate about his politics (the more so as he's isnt the predictable opinion). He had quite a rant on the Thatcher thread too as I recall.

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But TT, he's Big Sean MacGabhann. Just, fair and

> impartial. Caring and concerned. Considered and

> courteous. Hates Americans though.


LOL


> I was calling Keef a numpty because he called my

> mate Ken a see you next Tuesday. It's not the

> first time he's been called a numpty by any

> means.


And probably won't be the last, but I'll live with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Leon. Very reasonably priced and called out on the same day I contacted him! 
    • ''He caused chaos  in this country with his put down of everything British and his many dismal words about the effects of Brexit on this country.'' What utter tosh. Carney had to mitigate the effects of Brexit caused by plastic patriots like Farage. For example, immediately after the 2016 Brexit vote the BoE had to intervene fiscally by dropping interest rates and increasing QE in order to prevent the economy from taking a big hit.  They were unable to prevent the £ from crashing at the time, and it has since been worked out that the effect of that alone caused a circa £900/year hit to each UK household, which equates to the UK @ £450m/week.   There's reams of data out there that shows the economic damage Brexit has caused to the UK. Here's one looking at business investment, admittedly not very sexy but kinda important if you want to achieve economic growth. It's clear to see that prior to 2016 we had reached parity with some of our main rivals, but since then we've flatlined. All that Brexit has achieved is to win the race to the bottom. There's a reason why Farage never brought up Brexit at the last election, he knows himself it hasn't delivered on any of the promises, quite the reverse in fact.  Labour, stupidly, by saying they can make Brexit work have in effect given Farage a Get Out of Jail Free card...    
    • I don't remember this! What on earth were people feeding their dogs? Chalk?!
    • How did he "put down everything British"? Please give examples! And as for "the effects of Brexit on this country", do you think he was wrong? What exactly do you think are the positive effects of Brexit on this country? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...