Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I guess that the original victim paid because he thought someone may have lost a wedding ring and that the person showing it to him was about to pocket the ring and not hand it in to the police, meaning that it would be lost to the original owner for ever. I know I would feel pretty gutted if I lost my wedding ring and the person who fell foul of this scam was probably trying to prevent someone else feeling like that!

Carrie, you are absolutely correct in your analysis.


There was nothing other than altruism at the heart of the decision to pay to secure the ring. A wedding band is probably the single most significant piece of jewellery and it was made clear that the intention of the "finder" was to sell that ring for cash. The handing over of money was a deliberate strategy to allow the ring to be given to the police so that the person who lost it would stnd more chance of having it returned to them. That it turned out to be a fake was only a post hoc revelation.


A Grove Vale trader was also present at the time (it occurred outside their premises) and felt - and still feels - that with the evidence available at the time, it was the right action to take. The ring was subsequently taken to a Lordship Lane jeweller, who was unable to confirm whether it was or wasn't gold without giving it the proverbial acid test - that's an indicator of the standard of production of these items.


It saddens me that an intention to raise awareness has produced less than pleasant responses. I'm glad to be with someone who gives the benefit of the doubt rather than someone who sneers and walks on by.

I'm with you there Hare. What a lot of cynics out there.


For all the random acts of kindness I have received from strangers I feel that the few times I have clearly been conned have very little significance.


For example I was in Bogota airport without any money, not realising there was an exit fee to leave the country. A German traveller overheard our dilemma and offered to pay the fee for us all- about ?30. This was despite being robbed at knifepoint on his first day in Colombia and losing everything he had.(I of course took his address and repaid him).


Someone paid my bus fare when I thought I had lost ny oyster card - I hadn't- very embarassing as I didn't have any cash to repay them. I can see that that would seem like a pretty basic scam to all you cynics, fortunately the person offering wasn't similarly cursed and just thought it was very funny.


I very happily offer what I can when the situation arises.


What goes around comes around.

My my, people really are touchy about being scammed. It's not a stain on your character, it's just something that really shouldn't happen if you have your wits about you. And if it does, shrug it off and try not to let it happen again.


I get a feeling that there are people in this conversation who feel it more virtuous to be scammed than to distrust a scammer. Weird...

Hows about this -


sacammer "give me some money for this ring I found or I'll steal it"


me "Hows about I punch you in the face ?"


alternative


Real life needy type person "can you help me please sir I'm lost, voulnerable and (or) in need of help"


me "certainly how may I be of help ?"


the lesson - context and situational awareness (absence of the normal, presence of the abnormal). It's not cynical just a developed state of mind.

Thanks to this thread I was well-prepared just off St Giles High street earlier today when a young woman bent down then showed me a wedding ring in her hand and said 'Amazing! It's gold!' . With hindsight I wish I hadn't said 'it's a scam' and walked off as I never found out which variant of the story she was using.
  • 3 weeks later...

Hiya all


This scam depends upon you being altruistic and helpful. It exploits your social habits.


Recently a woman approached me in East Dulwich appearing to be very distraught and in floods of tears. Guess what...she needed money. Don't get fooled..money is very rarely the source of a real problem.


Nobody likes to feel that they are hard or cold or indifferent.


Rgutsell

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...