Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Final tonight, is it a foregone conclusion that Claire will win it??? I'm not sure, as she got a bit of a beasting at the end of the board room last week... I'm having an outside bet on Lee, although that is probably unwise, as I think his nerves get the better of him again in a presentation tonight...
Yep I definitely read that the winner will be chosen from the winning duo - but who knows, there may be another twist? I don't really mind who wins as long as it's not that preening pouting backstabber Alex. I am still fuming at the way he stitched Lucinda up in the boardroom last week by casually dropping in to the conversation that she had said she wasn't sure the job was right for her. So unnecessary!

First winner was a foxy blonde female type as I recall!


Claire was a bit gobby for Sralan I reckons and I think he was impressed that Lee had not once been in the boardroom.


Anyway, someone told me that they saw Claire having a brazillian in Streatham somewhere and it has put me off my food now for months so I am glad she lost!


/me vomits at the thought of it

EDIT - first winner was Tim Campbell, good looking black guy off of the Underground.


Second winner was Michelle Dewberry, was it? She went and betrayed SRalan by getting pregnant on the job - perhaps confirming his mistrust of employing obviously fertile women. However, the fact she chose the blue-suit-brown-shoed Narcissist Syed as her impregnator was much more damning evidence of her lack of judgement.


Since then he has chosen posh serial bankrupt wet Simon Armitage over gobby Ruth Badger, and of course, Lee, over gobby Clurr.


Still, Clurr will have noted that Lee has won a job to selling outdoor ad space on digital screens. I think SRalan knew what he was doing - and he was doing her a favour.

Katie Hopkins walked out before the final, although Alan Sugar swears he would have fired her that week anyway. Simon then beat that Irish lass.


With regards last night, I basically realised that they were all really really sh!te, and I don't think Claire was robbed, she just got everyone's attention because she's gobby, and she kept on going on about how she'd changed.


Lee really wanted it, and he'll earn his money, and disappear in to some company falling under Sir Alan's umbrella... Michelle Dewberry talks about being Sir Alan's right hand woman after winning the apprentice. What a load of bo!!ocks. I seriously doubt they ever have anything to do with him again.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...