Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but I have just accepted a new job and my accomodation has fallen through, so I am now looking at Dulwich or East Dulwich to live. Any ideas as to which is better? My new employer is near Waterloo and Southwark tube, so ideally whichever one is the best for commuting.

Would anyone be able to recommend B&B's to stay in (in East Dulwich) while I look for flats?


Also would anyone be able to recommend an estate agent in Dulwich or East Dulwich?


Sorry to have so many questions!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2940-new-to-east-dulwich/
Share on other sites

Welcome.


Most of us would recommend East Dulwich - probably slightly less costly than Dulwich proper. No. 63 Bus (starts at Forest Hill Tavern and goes past Peckham Rye and via Camberwell to Kings CRoss, passing through Elephant & Castle and passing by Southwark Tube - so Peckham Rye side of ED may be a good bet.


Don't know many B&B's but see B & B Threads


EState Agents are a hot topic here - but a swift walk along Lordship Lane will give you about 15 to choose from.


You'll like it here (both ED and this forum). Enjoy.

Greetings Lolalola


Only you can answer the question of East Dulwich or Dulwich by visiting the area for at least a weekend. East (I'm talkining in the heart of Lordship Lane near Goose Green) is funkier, livelier, great shopping and good for transport links but then is also more noisy, crowded and can be difficult for parking. Dulwich proper is quite suburban, arguably the residents are a bit older and family orientated. Property is more expensive and transport links not great. Both areas have great green spaces, Peckham Rye and Dulwich Park and are good for the Arts whatever you're into. Have fun.

Thank you so much for your replies. I've been reading and talked to an American friend who lived in the area last year, both said East Dulwich unless you have children in school and want a more suburbian life! Which isn't yet the priority!

Visiting for 4 days next week, so really hoping to get a good feel of the area and find somewhere to live fast.


Do you know from East Dulwich how long it takes to get to Southwark tube and how?


Lola

lolalola


Southwark tube station will be pretty redundant for you as there is no tube to take you there - but the 63 bus goes right past and depending what time of day you travel can take about 30 mins from ED to the tube station


You can also get the 176 bus from Lordship Lane area which goes to Waterloo (better to hop off just before at the roundabout and walk the last bit depending on where you actually work mind you)


And if you are in the area on Friday evening next week, come join us at the Crystal Palace Tavern off Lordship Lane where plenty of us forumites are having a monthly drink - you will get PLENTY of feedback from a wide variety of characters

lol thanks Sean, see how little I know, a bus to Southwark is perfect as my office is near there!

I would love to meet up on Friday night with the forum lot, but sadly I leave Friday afternoon, had I know I would have waited until Sat to leave.

Does anyone know where I could get info on where the bus' go from ED, is there a bus timetable/guide?


Sorry to keep asking questions, I'm totally new to living in London (having lived in Home Counties, Yorkshire and South West!)!


Now I'm off to google estate agents in ED and hope I'll be in luck within finding something asap!

Hi lolalola


Here's a link to a PDF document by Transport for London that shows all the bus routes. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/gettingaround/maps/buses/pdf/eastdulwich-2073.pdf


This TFL website shows you the various routes if you enter in you start and destination http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/user/XSLT_TRIP_REQUEST2?language=en


You'll like it here, just make sure you don't drop litter or drive through no entry roads.

Lolalola,

Before I came to ED I lived on a tube line, so buses were new to me. I'd say that you should invest in an Oyster bus pass (?13.50 for a week) which will mean you can jump on the first one that comes and then get on the one to take you to your final destination later on. I get on the 40 or 185 down to Camberwell and then swap to a 171 or 68 if I can't get a 176, which goes all the way from East Dulwich, down thru Camberwell and Walworth and up to the Elephant and over Waterloo Bridge. The 63 would be great for you if you choose to live anywhere nearer to the Peckham Rye side. Even if you don't, you can catch any of the above and then swap to the 63 at Elephant. IMHO, the timetables are good for first and last buses only. Generally, the bus service is good (if a little dirty and littered). Nero

I'm a firm believer in "no change-overs = path to heaven" but even I have come around to the "oh just get to Camberwell Green and change when you get there" way of thinking


Don't rule out walking the last bit either - it makes sitting outside the EDT with a pint afterwards less guilt-ridden

My feeling is I'd rather go on a bus and take longer because I can (usually) get a seat where I can read or look out of the window, rather than being hideously crammed into a mass of standing people on a train.


I know some people prefer a short and uncomfortable journey to a longer and more pleasant one, though ....


Each to their own .....


:)

A quicker way to commute would be to get the train from East Dulwich to London Bridge. And then - a much quicker change than going to the tube - would be to get a train going to Charing Cross - next stop from London Bridge is Waterloo East. Trains leave to Charing X every 10 minutes and the change from the trains is pretty quick, just go over the footbridge to platform 6.

If you're going by bus from Lordship Lane in the morning rush hour, and would normally get on at the stop outside the Post Office (or one after that), it's often worth walking to the stop before, as (depending on the time) buses may be full by the time they get to the Post Office stop.


Though everyone else seems to have cottoned on to this, so we will all end up starting our journeys at Penge soon :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...