Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, Bob is most definitely a Dulwichmum. Not that I have anything against them, well, perhaps their gargantuan '4x4 buggies', but that's not really fair because they are soooo desirable. Anyhow, I digress. Bob? Just a note to help your man masquerade more successful. Top Trumps was not a 'collecting' phenomena, not in the strictest sense, it was a card game. One didn't barter the cards in the play ground in that misty eyed, nostalgic way you are describing. That refers to the still present 'cigarette card/Panini sticker' fads boys enjoy so much, an innate quality of adolescent masculinity that has been exploited by scurrilous marketeers for generations. If I may refresh your memory, 'Bob'. The cards were themed around topics chosen to excite impressionable boys, aforementioned 'qualities' coursing through their veins, each a budding speed freak, geek or embryonic despot: Tanks, Ships, Helicopters, Fighter Planes, Super Cars, Bridges, etc Each card, or trump, carried an illustrated example of the theme (a cypher, really for the sublimation of aforementioned) which was assigned a 'value' based on the included data (statistics and dimensions etc). The game was organised around a principle of pitching stats against stats, strong against weak; no bartering took place. Just a process of annihilation as the strong 'Top Trumps' devoured the weak. One could swap entire sets (but that was for the truly geeky and never actually happened, not in my school anyway). Ok, 'BoB?'


By the way, I saw the actress who teams up with the 'Peep Show' boys in the fancy kids shop in Lordship Lane. I think she was after a 4x4.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gosh, I am sorry! I read something about James

> Nesbit and it just makes me see red...



What did you read, dear lady? Or was it the mere mention of this much maligned actor's name, that has sent you into a frenzy?

DaveR, no, not really, I just had a feeling, followed my instincts. Bob is on an earlier thread trying to get in with the guys, doing guy jokes, 'mate'. You know the sort. She was very good but over extended herself and the top trump faux pas gave her away. I, sleuth like, had to exposed her. Just a question of putting the clues together, any bloke could do it. Once you've learnt how to do it properly, though, the manmasks fall away quickly, some don't have the stomach for it, but you have to be vigilant at all times, they're sneaky. It's no good just going in there 'Cleese at the stoning'- 'are there any women here?'- no, you won't catch 'em like that. Need to wait in ambush, they'll get carried away at some point, bring in some exponential truth gleaned from a magazine article read at the hairdressers, or such like. Some vicarious mis-register of a guy experience that just won't seem right to seasoned masculine ears. They'll get carried away. They like the sound of their own (textually deepened) voices too much, couriered in on fraudulent appellations. Lie in wait, DaveR, Victor/Victoria will hoist herself, soon enough, just don't be fooled by the petard. Move the thread onto BBQ's, they'll be armed but you'll know the territory. Don't get seduced.

And from yesterday's "Telegraph" an interview with Mr Nesbitt:


How much did your home cost to buy and what's it worth now?


Can I start talking about the house I owned before? It's just that we did particularly well with it. About ten years ago we bought a four-bedroom semi-detached house for ?250,000 in East Dulwich, not far from where we are now. Then three years ago we sold it for ?500,000, and I thought that was a very good profit.


We moved to our current home, an Edwardian detached, and that cost me around ?750,000. We have had some renovation work done to it and goodness knows what it's worth now - I keep reading that property prices are falling so I'm not optimistic.


I have also bought a seasonal ownership in a five-bedroom home at Gleneagles because I am mad about golf. It means we are entitled to a certain number of holiday weeks there each year and I think it's a good deal when you think about what you are saving on staying in a hotel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...